Implementation of the Authority of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency in Presenting Business Actors With the Assistance of Police Investigators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i6.3140Keywords:
Consumer Protection, Investigators, Authority.Abstract
Introduction: The Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency has the authority to request the assistance of investigators in presenting business actors as stipulated in the Consumer Protection Law.
Purposes of the Research: Analyzing why business actors are not present in the dispute resolution process, then settlement efforts through the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency cannot be continued.
Methods of the Research: This study uses a juridical-empirical method with data collection techniques through interviews, documentation, and literature studies.
Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that the Yogyakarta Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency basically has the legal authority to present business actors forcibly with the help of investigators if the business actors are not present voluntarily. However, in practice, this authority has never been used, and is even considered unenforceable. The main obstacle in the implementation of this authority lies in the legal factors themselves, especially the unclear legal norms regarding the scope of the role of investigators in the context of consumer disputes. In addition, although the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency has been normatively regulated in law, the investigator does not have any technical guidelines or implementing rules that are the basis for following up on requests from the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence). Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Atmadja, I Dewa Gede, and I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. Teori-Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.
Atmoko, Dwi, and Adhalia Septia Saputri. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Malang: Literasi Nusantara Abadi, 2022.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
Chrisdanty, Febry. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Pengadilan Dan Non Litigasi Oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK).” Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif 11, no. 2 (2020): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v11i2.9.
Galih Orlando. “Efektivitas Hukum Dan Fungsi Hukum Di Indonesia.” Tarbiyah bil Qalam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama dan Sains 6, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.58822/tbq.v6i1.77.
Irfansyah, Irfansyah. “Peran Strategis Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Ensiklopedia Sosial Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 58–62. https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v3i1.687.
J. Moleong, Lexy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
Kurniawan. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen: Problematika Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK). Malang: Univessitas Brawijaya Press, 2011.
Mahfuzd, Abdurrosyid. “Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Peredaran Produk Oli Motor Palsu Di Kota Semarang.” Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2024.
Muhammad, Hana. “Efektivitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Bagian Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Melindungi Kepentingan Konsumen Di Indonesia.” Nusa Putra, 2022. http://repository.nusaputra.ac.id/id/eprint/345.
Nisantika, Riris, and Ni Luh Putu Egi Santika Maharani. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK).” Jurnal Locus Delicti 2, no. 1 (2021): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v2i1.458.
Prayitno, Isnu Harjo, Puji Iman Jarkasih, and H Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan Mp. “Eksistensi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Kota Tangerang Selatan Dalam Melakukan Perlindungan Terhadap Hak-Hak Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Pamulang Law Review 4, no. 1 (2021): 43. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v4i1.12790.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, 2015.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. 2nd ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2023.
Yurizal, Yurizal. Reformasi Kewenangan Polri Dan PPNS Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aulia Cahyono Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
