Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision on the Authority of the Financial and Development Supervisory Board in Determining State Losses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v6i3.3857Keywords:
State Financial Losses, Financial and Development Supervisory Board, Constitutional Court DecisionAbstract
Introduction: This research examines the authority of the Financial and Development Supervisory Board in auditing state financial losses following Constitutional Court Decision Number: 28/PUU-XXIV/2026 in corruption cases, as regulated under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. The decision emphasizes that auditing state losses constitutes the constitutional authority of the Supreme Audit Board.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the legal implications arising from Constitutional Court Decision Number 28/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the authority of Financial and Development Supervisory Board in auditing state financial losses. It focuses on assessing how the decision reshapes institutional roles and affects the legal framework governing the determination of state losses in corruption cases.
Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical method (normative law research), which is based on legal norms applicable within society. This approach analyzes statutory regulations, legal principles, and relevant doctrines to understand how legal norms function as guidelines for behavior, particularly in relation to institutional authority in auditing state financial losses.
Findings of the Research: The findings show that the Constitutional Court's decision functionally limits the Financial and Development Supervisory Board authority in determining state losses, shifting it to the role of investigating support and initial data provider. However, structural uncertainties have not been fully resolved due to derivative regulations, such as Presidential Regulation Number 192 of 2014, which recognizes that Financial and Development Supervisory Board authority is still in effect without a clear transition mechanism. The novelty of this research lies in an in-depth analysis of the normative void after the Constitutional Court's decision that has not been addressed by implementing regulations, as well as its practical implications for the effectiveness of corruption eradication.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Amalyh, Cut Faizal, Firnanda Irma, Merliani Riskiana Putri, Wikha Rahmaleni, and Kuswan Hadji. “Peran BPK Sebagai Lembaga Negara Dalam Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Di Indonesia.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 06, no. 01 (2025): 169–78. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i01.938.
Benuf, Kornelius, Siti Mahmudah, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurangi Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160
Eko Syukri Mulyadi, and Rachman Hakim. “Peran Audit Investigatif Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dan Whistleblowing System Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik Dan Negara 2, no. 6 (2025): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i6.704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i6.704
Gusman, Erry. “Kedudukan BPKP Dalam Mengaudit Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 31/PUU-X/2012.” Ensiklopedia Social Review 1, no. 3 (2019): 348–57. https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v1i3.390.
Harbina, Divany, Emzilena Kaban, Keshia Annisa Putri, Arif Pujawangsa Paksi, and Irwan Triadi. “Konsep Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (The Concept Rule Of Law From The Perspective Of Indonesian Constitutional Law).” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 3 (2024): 290. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11670332.
Hidayat, Sabrina, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Ali Rizky, and Endang Seriyati. “Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Dalam Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 5, no. 2 (2023): 592–604. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v5i2.55.
Irawan, Nadia Fitri, and Afif Syarif. “Fungsi Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 192 Tahun 2014.” Mendapo Journal of Administration Law 2 (2021): 6. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v2i2.13222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v2i2.13222
Wurangian, Mecky, Jullie J Sondakh, and Hendrik Manossoh. “Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Audit Investigatif Dan Audit Penghitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Kajian Dari Sudut Pandang Auditor Pada Perwakilan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan Provins Sulawesi Utara.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “GOODWILL” 12, no. 2 (2021): 264–75. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v12i2.37614.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asria Wahyuni Ahmad, Mohammad Feir Chalifardy Na'a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
