Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute

Fransiskus Kandunmas; Rieta Lieke Lontoh; Primus Aryesam

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute

Fransiskus Kandunmas⁽¹⁾, Rieta Lieke Lontoh⁽²⁾, Primus Aryesam⁽³⁾

(1) Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

In 2005, the trial of land grant dispute was held between the Diocese of Amboina as the plaintiff against MR et al. as a defendant in the District Court Tual Southeast Moluccas. This trial was won by the Diocese of Amboina. The defendant then filed an appeal, Cassation and judicial review up to the level of the Supreme Court. Based on the Supreme Court decision no. 166/Pk / year 2010, the panel of judges ruled that the Diocese of Amboina as the legal owner of the land and sentenced the defendant to pay a fine and return the object of dispute without any conditions. Since the issuance of the decision until now, the Diocese of Amboina has not executed the land object, because the Diocese of Amboina has not submitted an application for execution to the District Court in accordance with the provisions of Article 196 HIR due to normative juridical considerations of the church; humanitarian reasons and the urgency of utilizing the object of dispute.. The purpose of this research is to understand the application of Supreme Court decision No. 166/Pk/Pdt / 2010 in dispute over land grant Diocese of Amboina. The author uses normative juridical methods and also through interviews to obtain information as a support in writing this thesis. The result of the research found that decision has permanent force and for the realization of justice and legal certainty for the parties, especially the Diocese of Amboina, the execution action must be carried out immediately in cooperation with the local district court.

Keywords

Execution; Judge’s Ruled; Legal Binding

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

Published

2022-08-31

How To Cite

APA: Kandunmas, F., Lontoh, R.L., & Aryesam, P. (2022). Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(2), 208-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082.

IEEE: F. Kandunmas, R.L. Lontoh, and P. Aryesam, "Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 208-216, Aug. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

Harvard: Kandunmas, F., Lontoh, R.L., and Aryesam, P., (2022). "Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 3(2), pp. 208-216. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082 (Accessed on: 18 April 2025)

Chicago: Kandunmas, Fransiskus, Rieta Lieke Lontoh, and Primus Aryesam. "Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute." Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 2 (August 26, 2022): 208-216. Accessed April 18, 2025. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

Vancouver: Kandunmas F, Lontoh RL, Aryesam P. Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 Aug 31 [cited 2025 Apr 18];3(2):208-216. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

MLA 8th: Kandunmas, Fransiskus, Rieta Lieke Lontoh, and Primus Aryesam. "Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 3, no. 2, 26 Aug. 2022, pp. 208-216, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082. Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV1082,
		author = {Fransiskus Kandunmas and Rieta Lontoh and Primus Aryesam},
		title = {Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {3},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Execution; Judge’s Ruled; Legal Binding},
		abstract = {In 2005, the trial of land grant dispute was held between the Diocese of Amboina as the plaintiff against MR et al. as a defendant in the District Court Tual Southeast Moluccas. This trial was won by the Diocese of Amboina. The defendant then filed an appeal, Cassation and judicial review up to the level of the Supreme Court. Based on the Supreme Court decision no. 166/Pk / year 2010, the panel of judges ruled that the Diocese of Amboina as the legal owner of the land and sentenced the defendant to pay a fine and return the object of dispute without any conditions. Since the issuance of the decision until now, the Diocese of Amboina has not executed the land object, because the Diocese of Amboina has not submitted an application for execution to the District Court in accordance with the provisions of Article 196 HIR due to normative juridical considerations of the church; humanitarian reasons and the urgency of utilizing the object of dispute.. The purpose of this research is to understand the application of Supreme Court decision No. 166/Pk/Pdt / 2010 in dispute over land grant Diocese of Amboina. The author uses normative juridical methods and also through interviews to obtain information as a support in writing this thesis. The result of the research found that decision has permanent force and for the realization of justice and legal certainty for the parties, especially the Diocese of Amboina, the execution action must be carried out immediately in cooperation with the local district court.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {208--216}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1082}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 567 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 493 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Application of A Judge's Ruled In A Civil Dispute

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Fransiskus Kandunmas; Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Rieta Lieke Lontoh; Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Primus Aryesam; Faculty of Law De La Salle Catholic University, Manado

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Execution; Judge’s Ruled; Legal Binding

4.	Description	Abstract	In 2005, the trial of land grant dispute was held between the Diocese of Amboina as the plaintiff against MR et al. as a defendant in the District Court Tual Southeast Moluccas. This trial was won by the Diocese of Amboina. The defendant then filed an appeal, Cassation and judicial review up to the level of the Supreme Court. Based on the Supreme Court decision no. 166/Pk / year 2010, the panel of judges ruled that the Diocese of Amboina as the legal owner of the land and sentenced the defendant to pay a fine and return the object of dispute without any conditions. Since the issuance of the decision until now, the Diocese of Amboina has not executed the land object, because the Diocese of Amboina has not submitted an application for execution to the District Court in accordance with the provisions of Article 196 HIR due to normative juridical considerations of the church; humanitarian reasons and the urgency of utilizing the object of dispute.. The purpose of this research is to understand the application of Supreme Court decision No. 166/Pk/Pdt / 2010 in dispute over land grant Diocese of Amboina. The author uses normative juridical methods and also through interviews to obtain information as a support in writing this thesis. The result of the research found that decision has permanent force and for the realization of justice and legal certainty for the parties, especially the Diocese of Amboina, the execution action must be carried out immediately in cooperation with the local district court.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2022-08-31

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1082

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/ballrev.v3i2.1082

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 3, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 2022

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.