Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization

Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan; Frandy Septior Nababan

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468

Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization

Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan⁽¹⁾, Frandy Septior Nababan⁽²⁾

(1) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Pranata Law Firm, Jambi, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

The composition of Homologation that has been approved is ratified and decided by the court. But the problem is when composition that have been agreed and have been validated are then changed for certain interests so that the contents are no longer the same that has been validated. The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal consequences of amendments and/or the implementation of homologation outside the court. This study case uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory, case approach, and conceptual approach. Homologation composition through Suspension of Obligation for Payment and Bankruptcy have been regulated, so when there is a change and/or implementation of a composition agreement passed by the court (Homologation) outside the court, it is invalid.

Keywords

Homologation; Bankruptcy; suspension of debt payment obligations; composition agreement.

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468

Published

2023-05-02

How To Cite

APA: Panjaitan, W.N., & Nababan, F.S. (2023). Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization. Batulis Civil Law Review, 4(1), 51-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468.

IEEE: W.N. Panjaitan, and F.S. Nababan, "Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51-66, May. 2023. Accessed on: Nov. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468

Harvard: Panjaitan, W.N., and Nababan, F.S., (2023). "Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 4(1), pp. 51-66. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468 (Accessed on: 21 November 2024)

Chicago: Panjaitan, Wijaya Natalia, and Frandy Septior Nababan. "Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization." Batulis Civil Law Review 4, no. 1 (May 2, 2023): 51-66. Accessed November 21, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468

Vancouver: Panjaitan WN, Nababan FS. Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2023 May 2 [cited 2024 Nov 21];4(1):51-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468

MLA 8th: Panjaitan, Wijaya Natalia, and Frandy Septior Nababan. "Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2 May. 2023, pp. 51-66, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV1468,
		author = {Wijaya Panjaitan and Frandy Nababan},
		title = {Legal Consequences of Amendment And/Or Implementation of Homologation Outside Court Authorization},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {4},
		number = {1},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Homologation; Bankruptcy; suspension of debt payment obligations; composition agreement.},
		abstract = {The composition of Homologation that has been approved is ratified and decided by the court. But the problem is when composition that have been agreed and have been validated are then changed for certain interests so that the contents are no longer the same that has been validated. The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal consequences of amendments and/or the implementation of homologation outside the court. This study case uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory, case approach, and conceptual approach. Homologation composition through Suspension of Obligation for Payment and Bankruptcy have been regulated, so when there is a change and/or implementation of a composition agreement passed by the court (Homologation) outside the court, it is invalid.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {51--66}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1468},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1468}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Restrukturisasi Utang Terhadap Perusahaan GO PUBLIC Dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.103-111

Anatami, D. (2021). Pengenalan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dan Kepailitan. Deepublish.

Aprita, S. (2022). Meluruskan Logika Pemerintah Soal Kegentingan Moratorium UU Kepailitan dan PKPU. ADALAH: Buletin Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6(6), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v6i6.27582

Asyadie, Z. (2017). Hukum Bisnis Prinsip dalam Pelaksanaannya Di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Basiang, M. (2017). The Contemporary Law Dictionary. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Casanova, F. Y., Dwiatin, L., & Eka, D. (2018). Analisis Homologasi Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) sebagai Upaya Pencegah Terjadinya Kepailitan (Studi Putusan No. 59/Pdt.Sus-PKPU.PN.PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). Pactum Law Journal, 1, 90–98.

Hartono, D. T. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 4(1), 1–9.

Irianto, C. (2015). Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaraan Utang (PKPU). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.399-418

Kornelis, Y., & Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Implementasi Restrukturisasi Dalam Prosesi Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat, 7(2), 237–277. https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v7i2.1739

Korompis, V. R. (n.d.). Perubahan atas Perjanjian Perdamaian yang Telah Disahkan oleh Pengadilan Niaga. Kcaselawyer.Com. https://kcaselawyer.com/perubahan-atas-perjanjian-perdamaian-yang-telah-disahkan-oleh-pengadilan-niaga/

Manik, E. (2012). Cara Mudah Memahami Proses Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Mandar Maju.

Pramudita, S. A., Kartikasari, & Cahyadini, A. (2020). Kedudukan Hukum Menkominfo dalam Pelaksanaan Perdamaian menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Legal Standing, 4(1), 101–117.

Purba, M., Sunarmi, Nasution, B., & Devi, K. (2019). Homologasi Penundaan kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) sebagai Upaya Prefentif Terjadinya Pailit : Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 137K/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2014. USU Law Journal, 7(2), 138–148.

Sastrawidjaja, M. S. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Premada Media.

Satrio, J. (1995). Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Timbul dari Perjanjian,. Citra Adiyta Bakti.

Sitompul, M. M. P. (2009). Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang Perusahaan dengan Perdamaian di dalam atau di luar Proses Kepailitan (Studi Mengenai Lembaga Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang) [Universitas Sumatra Utara]. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/33962

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2018). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Soeprapto, H. H. (1984). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan. Liberty.

Stanly, V., & Tanawijaya, H. (2022). Kedudukan Kreditur Konkuren yang Membatalkan Perjanjian Perdamaian menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Putusan Nomor 02/PDT.SUS-Pembatalan Perdamaian jo, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 5(2), 380–402.

Subekti. (2003). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Subhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik Peradilan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Supramono, G. (2013). Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Suyatno, R. A. (2017). Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Syahrani, R. (2006). Seluk Beluk Dan Asas Asas Hukum Perdata. Alumni.

Yuhassarie, E. (2005). Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Perkembangannya. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.

Full Text: PDF