Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples

Ekberth Vallen Noya

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518

Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples

Ekberth Vallen Noya⁽¹⁾

(1) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article describes the position of indigenous peoples who are starting to be marginalized due to the democratization process of existing laws. This article aims to show how far the process of legal democratization has progressed so that indigenous peoples are often marginalized while the law should uphold human rights. The research method used is the normative research method, and the research approaches used are the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the analytical approach, so that they can help examine and find good research results. The democratic method begins with the freedom of the right to vote, which allows every citizen to participate in making political decisions. Each participant has equal rights in determining their own choices and also has the opportunity to be elected. The principle of a majority vote is essential to reaching decisions in the concept of democracy. "Democracy" contains three phenomena at once, namely political phenomena (power), ethical phenomena (moral teachings), and legal phenomena, which mutually form this theory with a theoretical basis that firmly rejects the authoritarian and totalitarian (political) order of power. It is based on this method that the rights and customs of indigenous peoples are increasingly marginalized.

Keywords

Indigenous Peoples, Legal Democratization; Cultur

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518

Published

2023-05-02

How To Cite

APA: Noya, E.V. (2023). Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples. Batulis Civil Law Review, 4(1), 86-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518.

IEEE: E.V. Noya, "Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 86-94, May. 2023. Accessed on: May. 4, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518

Harvard: Noya, E.V., (2023). "Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 4(1), pp. 86-94. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518 (Accessed on: 4 May 2024)

Chicago: Noya, Ekberth Vallen. "Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples." Batulis Civil Law Review 4, no. 1 (May 2, 2023): 86-94. Accessed May 4, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518

Vancouver: Noya EV. Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2023 May 2 [cited 2024 May 4];4(1):86-94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518

MLA 8th: Noya, Ekberth Vallen. "Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2 May. 2023, pp. 86-94, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518. Accessed 4 May. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV1518,
		author = {Ekberth Noya},
		title = {Legal Democratization of the Existence of Indigenous Peoples},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {4},
		number = {1},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Indigenous Peoples, Legal Democratization; Cultur},
		abstract = {This article describes the position of indigenous peoples who are starting to be marginalized due to the democratization process of existing laws. This article aims to show how far the process of legal democratization has progressed so that indigenous peoples are often marginalized while the law should uphold human rights. The research method used is the normative research method, and the research approaches used are the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the analytical approach, so that they can help examine and find good research results. The democratic method begins with the freedom of the right to vote, which allows every citizen to participate in making political decisions. Each participant has equal rights in determining their own choices and also has the opportunity to be elected. The principle of a majority vote is essential to reaching decisions in the concept of democracy. "Democracy" contains three phenomena at once, namely political phenomena (power), ethical phenomena (moral teachings), and legal phenomena, which mutually form this theory with a theoretical basis that firmly rejects the authoritarian and totalitarian (political) order of power. It is based on this method that the rights and customs of indigenous peoples are increasingly marginalized.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {86--94}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1518},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1518}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Abdulrahman. (1984). Hukum Adat Menurut Perundang-Undanga Republik Indonesia. Cendana Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar Demokrasi, Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum dan HAM. Konstitusi Press.

Astawa, I. G. P. (2009). Memahami Ilmu Negara dan Teori Negara. Refika Aditama.

Azra, A. (2000). Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, Masyarakat Madani. ICCE UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Fatah, S. (1994). Masalah dan Prospek Demokrasi di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.

Freeman, M. D. A. (2001). Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.

Fuady, M. (2010). Konsep Negara Demokrasi. Refika Aditama.

H, D., Sujadi, F., Dian, A., Ambarjaya, B. S., Rahmatia, D., UW, J., S, D., & Sulfiawan, W. (2016). Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pemerintaha Desa: Landasan Hukum dan Kelembagaan Pemerintahan Desa. Media Pustaka.

Hadikusuma, H. (1981). Hukum Ketatanegaraan Adat. Alumni.

Hadikusuma, H. (2003). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Adat Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Hazairin. (1970). Demokrasi Pancasila. Bina Aksara.

Huntington, S. P. (1995). Gelombang Demokrasi Ketiga. Grafiti Press.

Ilmar, A. (2014). Hukum Tata Pemerintahan. Prenada Media Group.

Kansil, C. S. T. (2008). Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kelsen, H. (2018). Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara (R. Muttaqien (trans.)). Nusa Media.

Manan, A. (2003). Hukum Islam Dalam Berbagai Wacana. Pustaka Bangsa Press.

Muhammad, B. (1998). Azas-Azas Hukum Adat Suatu Pengantar. Pradnya Paramita.

Nashir, H. (1999). Pragmatisme Politik Kaum Elite. Pustaka Pelajar.

Nurtjahjo, H. (2006). Filsafat Demokrasi. Sinar Grafika Offset.

Pide , A. S. M. (2014). Hukum adat : dahulu, kini, dan akan datang.

Soehardi, A. (1954). Pengantar Hukum Adat Indonesia. S-Gravenhage.

Soehino. (2000). Ilmu Negara. Liberty.

Soekarno. (2005). Dibawah Bendera Revolusi. Yayasan Bung Karno.

Soepomo, R. (1993). Hukum Adat. Pradnya Paramita.

Sorensen, G. (2014). Demokrasi Dan Demokratisasi (Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia yang Berubah). Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudiyat, I. (1989). Azas-Azas Hukum Adat. Liberty.

Sulardi. (2012). Menuju Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil Murni. Setara Press.

Tutik, T. T. (2011). Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Van Vollenhoven, C. (1987). Penemuan Hukum Adat. Djambatan.

Wattimena, J. A. Y., & Leatemia, W. (2021). Legal Legitimacy of Indigenous Peoples’rights In Natural Resources Management: The Case In Seram Barat. Awang Long Law Review, 4(1), 142–151.

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Masyarakat adat. Wikipedia.Org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masyarakat_adat

Full Text: PDF