Principles of Buyer’s Responsibility on Bid and Run Actions in Online Auction Buying and Selling Practices
)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The development of the internet causes the practice of buying and selling auctions can not only be done conventionally but can also be done online, one of which is by using Instagram media. This online auction transaction not only provides benefits and convenience for consumers but also has weaknesses and in fact in online auction buying and selling transactions , losses can not only be experienced by consumers, but business actors can also experience losses due to non-fulfillment of achievements that should be done by consumers. One of the consumer actions that harm business actors is Bid an Run in the practice of buying and selling online auctions on Instagram social media.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find out the application of the principle of buyer’s responsibility for bid and run actions as a form of legal protection for business actors.
Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is normative juridical or known as legal research which is carried out by studying and analyzing the substance of laws and regulations on the subject matter or legal issues in consistency with existing legal principles.
Results of the Research: The results show that Legal liability for buyers who in bad faith deliberately do not pay or take bid and run actions can be sued based on Article 1243 of the Civil Code, Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a and paragraph (4) of the ITE Law, and Article 6 letter a and b of the Consumer Law, as well as electronic agreements that have been agreed between business actors (auction account owners) and consumers (auction bidders). Business actors in this case can also sanction directly to consumers who have committed violations by blocking the consumer's account and being blacklisted so that consumers cannot bid with auction business actors anywhere.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1724
Published
2024-03-31
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV1724,
author = {Theresia Pesulima},
title = {Principles of Buyer’s Responsibility on Bid and Run Actions in Online Auction Buying and Selling Practices},
journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Responsibility; Online Auction; Bid and Run.},
abstract = {Introduction: The development of the internet causes the practice of buying and selling auctions can not only be done conventionally but can also be done online, one of which is by using Instagram media. This online auction transaction not only provides benefits and convenience for consumers but also has weaknesses and in fact in online auction buying and selling transactions , losses can not only be experienced by consumers, but business actors can also experience losses due to non-fulfillment of achievements that should be done by consumers. One of the consumer actions that harm business actors is Bid an Run in the practice of buying and selling online auctions on Instagram social media.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find out the application of the principle of buyer’s responsibility for bid and run actions as a form of legal protection for business actors.Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is normative juridical or known as legal research which is carried out by studying and analyzing the substance of laws and regulations on the subject matter or legal issues in consistency with existing legal principles.Results of the Research: The results show that Legal liability for buyers who in bad faith deliberately do not pay or take bid and run actions can be sued based on Article 1243 of the Civil Code, Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a and paragraph (4) of the ITE Law, and Article 6 letter a and b of the Consumer Law, as well as electronic agreements that have been agreed between business actors (auction account owners) and consumers (auction bidders). Business actors in this case can also sanction directly to consumers who have committed violations by blocking the consumer's account and being blacklisted so that consumers cannot bid with auction business actors anywhere.},
issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {8--16} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1724},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1724}
}
Journal Article
Anwar, Fahmi. “Changes and Problems of Social Media.” Journal of Muara Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts 1, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.343.
Danuta, and Krisnhoe Sukma. “Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory in Fraud Prevention on Procurement Through E-Procurement.” Journal of Accounting Studies 1, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v1i2.826.
Devi, Ria Sintha, and Feryanti Simarsoit. “Legal Protection for E-Commerce Consumers According to Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection.” Jurnal Rectum 2, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v2i2.644.
Dyastuti, Risqi Mumpuni. “Legal Effects of the Application of Good Faith Principles to International Investment Contracts in Indonesia.” Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v3i2.8962.
N, Annisa Putri. “Responsibilities of the Parties in Online Buying and Selling Transactions.” Journal Lex Privatum IX, no. 6 (2021).
Pariadi, Deky. “Supervision of E-Commerce in Trade Law and Consumer Protection Law.” Journal of Law and Development 48, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no3.1750.
Primayoga, Andhika Mediantara, Hendro Saptono, and Rinitami Njatrijani. “Legal Protection for Consumers Who Receive Goods Not According to Order in Online Buying and Selling Transactions.” Diponegoro Law Journal 8, no. 3 (2019): 1732–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.24558.
Ramdhan, Rizky Aditya, and Khusnul Fikriyah. “Review of Islamic Business Ethics on Buying and Selling Betta Fish with an Online Auction System on Instagram Sidoarjo Area.” Sibatik Journal 1, no. 8 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i8.1631318.
Wulandari, Yudha Sri. “Legal Protection for Consumers Against E-Commerce Buying and Selling Transactions.” Journal of Adjudication 2, no. 2 (2018).
Book
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. 1st ed. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2019.
Puntoadi, Danis. Creating Sales Through Social Media. PT Elex Komputindo, 2011.
Usman, Rachmadi. Auction Law. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Thesis, Online/World Wide Web and Others
Annur, Cindy Mutia. “The 4th Highest Number of Indonesian Instagram Users in the World.” Accessed July 20, 2023. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/05/04/jumlah-pengguna-instagram-indonesia-terbanyak-ke-4-di-dunia.
Astra, Ibid. “Auction Terms.” Accessed March 15, 2023. https://blog.ibid.astra.co.id/detail/buat-kamu-yang-belum-paham-yuk-kenalan-sama-istilah-istilah-yang-ada-di-lelang-wYI.
Marthen, Sicilya. “Buyer’s Good Faith in Online Buying and Selling Transactions through the Shopee Paylater Application,” 2023.
instagram.com/hobiauction. "Rule:s Bidder". Click to view: https://wwwinstagram.com/ s / aGlnaGxpZ2h0OjE3ODUxOTk2NzA1OTMzMzA1?story_media_id=2272519423871358879&utm_medium=copy_link. Retrieved March 15, 2023
: 288 times
Download : 251 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Principles of Buyer’s Responsibility on Bid and Run Actions in Online Auction Buying and Selling Practices |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Theresia Louize Pesulima; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Responsibility; Online Auction; Bid and Run. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The development of the internet causes the practice of buying and selling auctions can not only be done conventionally but can also be done online, one of which is by using Instagram media. This online auction transaction not only provides benefits and convenience for consumers but also has weaknesses and in fact in online auction buying and selling transactions , losses can not only be experienced by consumers, but business actors can also experience losses due to non-fulfillment of achievements that should be done by consumers. One of the consumer actions that harm business actors is Bid an Run in the practice of buying and selling online auctions on Instagram social media.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find out the application of the principle of buyer’s responsibility for bid and run actions as a form of legal protection for business actors.Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is normative juridical or known as legal research which is carried out by studying and analyzing the substance of laws and regulations on the subject matter or legal issues in consistency with existing legal principles.Results of the Research: The results show that Legal liability for buyers who in bad faith deliberately do not pay or take bid and run actions can be sued based on Article 1243 of the Civil Code, Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a and paragraph (4) of the ITE Law, and Article 6 letter a and b of the Consumer Law, as well as electronic agreements that have been agreed between business actors (auction account owners) and consumers (auction bidders). Business actors in this case can also sanction directly to consumers who have committed violations by blocking the consumer's account and being blacklisted so that consumers cannot bid with auction business actors anywhere. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-03-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1724 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1724 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 5, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, MARCH 2024 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2024 Theresia Louize Pesulima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
