Implementation of Traditional Knowledge Protection of Enbal Processing

Authors

  • Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Sabri Fataruba Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1846

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Traditional Knowledge, Copyright Act.

Abstract

Introduction: Implementation and regulations governing the protection of traditional knowledge is still considered less effective.  The law is expected to be able to overcome various problems that arise related to the protection of traditional knowledge from the community, especially the Kei Islands community on enbal processing knowledge.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the implementation of the protection provided by the copyright law on the ownership of a traditional knowledge which in this case is the processing of enbal traditionally done as a staple food in the Kei Islands community.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is juridical empirical.

Results of the Research: The results obtained are the implementation of the protection provided by the copyright law on the ownership of a traditional knowledge which in this case is the processing of enbal traditionally done as a staple food in the Kei Islands community has actually been regulated in Article 38 of the Copyright Act. However, this protection can be provided if the community continues to maintain traditional processing without the help of modern tools when processing enbal into staple foods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Journal Article

Atsar, Abdul. “Hukum Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta.” Law Reform 13, no. 2 (2017): 284–99. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i2.16162.

Ilyasa, Raden Muhammad Arvy. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Pengetahuan Tradisional Indonesia Terhadap Praktek Biopiracy Dalam Rezim Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 3 (2020): 170–94. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.9544.

Perangin-angin, Reh Bungana Beru, Ramsul Nababan, and Parlaungan G Siahaan. “Perlindungan Pengetahuan Tradisional Sebagai Hak Konstitusional Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (n.d.): 178–96. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1718.

Prasada, Erisa Ardika. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Tradisional Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 4, no. 1 (2022): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.32502/khk.v4i1.4488.

Sunaryo, Euis. “Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Perbatikan (Tinjauan Terhadap Batik Yogyakarta Dan Solo).” JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property 12, no. 2 (2019): 1. https://journal.uii.ac.id/JIPRO/article/view/12697a.

Book

Rushing, Francis W, and Carole Ganz Brown. Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology, and Economic Performance: International Comparisons. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.Syaifuddin, Muhammad. Hukum Perlindungan Rekayasa Genetika Relasi Moral, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Dan Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman Dan Paten Di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Implementation of Traditional Knowledge Protection of Enbal Processing. (2024). Batulis Civil Law Review, 5(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1846

Most read articles by the same author(s)