Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective

Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998

Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective

Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan⁽¹⁾

(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The inclusion of a third party's personal data as an emergency contact in an agreement is often done one-sidedly by the debtor, to the detriment of the third party who is often disturbed to find the debtor's whereabouts, even though the third party does’nt know and never agreed to have his personal data included as an emergency contact.

Purposes of the Research: This research aims to find out the abrogation of the principle of privity of contract in the context of one-sided withdrawal of a third party as an emergency contact in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht).

Methods of the Research: This research is using the normative juridical method. The approach is through legislation, which is the Civil Code and conceptual approaches.

Results of the Research: The principle of privity of contract in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht) will be invalid and cannot be applied to emergency contact if the third party whose name is included is not asked for prior approval by the parties in the agreement.

Keywords

Privity of contract; Emergency Contact; Borgtocht.

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998

Published

2024-03-31

How To Cite

APA: Panjaitan, W.N. (2024). Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective. Batulis Civil Law Review, 5(1), 54 - 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998.

IEEE: W.N. Panjaitan, "Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54 - 61, Mar. 2024. Accessed on: Nov. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998

Harvard: Panjaitan, W.N., (2024). "Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 5(1), pp. 54 - 61. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998 (Accessed on: 17 November 2024)

Chicago: Panjaitan, Wijaya Natalia. "Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review 5, no. 1 (March 31, 2024): 54 - 61. Accessed November 17, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998

Vancouver: Panjaitan WN. Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2024 Mar 31 [cited 2024 Nov 17];5(1):54 - 61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998

MLA 8th: Panjaitan, Wijaya Natalia. "Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 5, no. 1, 31 Mar. 2024, pp. 54 - 61, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998. Accessed 17 Nov. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV1998,
		author = {Wijaya Panjaitan},
		title = {Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {5},
		number = {1},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Privity of contract; Emergency Contact; Borgtocht.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The inclusion of a third party's personal data as an emergency contact in an agreement is often done one-sidedly by the debtor, to the detriment of the third party who is often disturbed to find the debtor's whereabouts, even though the third party does’nt know and never agreed to have his personal data included as an emergency contact.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to find out the abrogation of the principle of privity of contract in the context of one-sided withdrawal of a third party as an emergency contact in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht).Methods of the Research: This research is using the normative juridical method. The approach is through legislation, which is the Civil Code and conceptual approaches.Results of the Research: The principle of privity of contract in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht) will be invalid and cannot be applied to emergency contact if the third party whose name is included is not asked for prior approval by the parties in the agreement.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {54--61}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1998}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Journal Article

Angelin, Margareta Sevilla Rosa. “Hilangnya Esensi ‘Persetujuan’ Dalam Jaminan Perorangan Pada Praktik Pinjaman Online.” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2022): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.5882.

Mahadevi, Ni Putu Intan, and I Made Dedy Priyanto. “Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Orang Yang Identitasnya Digunakan Sebagai Emergency Contact Pinjol Secara Sepihak.” Kertha Negara 10, no. 5 (2022): 521–32. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/79328.

Mantili, Rai. “Actio Paulina Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Bagi Kreditor Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang (PKP).” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 2 (2020): 21–37. http://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/127/108.

Marzuki, Agus, and Arvie Johan. “Universalitas Asas Privity Of Contract.” Jurnal Tapis 10, no. 2 (2014): 106–24. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/view/1609.

Prasetyawati, Niken, and Tony Hanoraga. “Jaminan Kebendaan Dan Jaminan Perorangan Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Piutang.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH) 8, no. 1 (2015): 120–34. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v8i1.1247.

Shandy, Ricky, and Retno Dewi Pulung Sari. “Aspek Hukum Pencantuman Data Pribadi Secara Sepihak Sebagai Kontak Darurat Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Online.” Binamulia Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.452.

Shofiyah, Erni Nur, and Indri Fogar Susilowati. “Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Penerima Pinjaman Dalam Peer to Peer Lending.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 1–6. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/novum/article/view/30092.

Siahaan, Clara Fransiska Olivia, and Rica Gusmarani. “Penggunaan Jaminan Perorangan Dalam Praktik Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah.” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 2 (2023): 278–87. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/17048.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian.” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 107–20. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.318.

Sukmawati, Murlyta Nevi. “Personal Guarante Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan.” Airlangga Development Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 62–79. https://doi.org/10.20473/adj.v3i1.18153.

Yunianti, Nur Intan, and Ambar Budhisulistyawati. “Efektivitas Jaminan Perorangan (Personal Guarantee) Dalam Menunjang Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Di Bank BRI Cabang Surakarta Dan Bank BNI Syariah Cabang Surakarta.” Jurnal Privat Law 8, no. 1 (2020): 111–16. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40383.

Book

Black, Henry Campbell, and Bryan A Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary. New York: West Group, 2009.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Setiawan, I Ketut Oka. Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Full Text: PDF