Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective

Shenti Agustini(1email), Febri Jaya(2), Shelvi Rusdiana(3)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Making agreements in Indonesia can be done in written and unwritten form. This is in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract in the Civil Code. Unwritten agreements are also very often carried out in the business world because they are more efficient. However, unwritten agreements are problematic because they are very difficult to prove in civil court.

Purposes of the Research: There are 2 (two) objectives in this research, namely first, to analyze the legal strength of unwritten agreements from the perspective of civil law books and second, to analyze evidence in civil courts for cases of breach of contract in unwritten agreements. Then to find the right legal solution in resolving default problems in civil court.

Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is normative juridical. This method uses literature study techniques. The type of data used comes from primary data, namely the Civil Code and legal principles, namely freedom of contract. then the secondary legal material used is in the form of previous research articles which examine the validity of unwritten agreements.

Results of the Research: Based on the research results, it was found that unwritten agreements have binding legal force. However, in reality it is very difficult to prove it in court because evidence in civil law comes from written letters. Therefore, the solution that can be offered is the need for preventive and repressive legal efforts.

Keywords


Legality; Proofing; Unwritten Agreements; Civil Law.


DOI


10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033

Published


2024-07-31

How To Cite


APA: Agustini, S., Jaya, F., & Rusdiana, S. (2024). Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective. Batulis Civil Law Review, 5(2), 109 - 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033.
IEEE: S. Agustini, F. Jaya, and S. Rusdiana, "Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 109 - 115, Jul. 2024. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033
Harvard: Agustini, S., Jaya, F., and Rusdiana, S., (2024). "Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 5(2), pp. 109 - 115. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)
Chicago: Agustini, Shenti, Febri Jaya, and Shelvi Rusdiana. "Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review 5, no. 2 (July 31, 2024): 109 - 115. Accessed December 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033
Vancouver: Agustini S, Jaya F, Rusdiana S. Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2024 Jul 31 [cited 2024 Dec 22];5(2):109 - 115. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033
MLA 8th: Agustini, Shenti, Febri Jaya, and Shelvi Rusdiana. "Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 5, no. 2, 31 Jul. 2024, pp. 109 - 115, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{BALLREV2033,
		author = {Shenti Agustini and Febri Jaya and Shelvi Rusdiana},
		title = {Legality and Proof of Unwritten Agreements from a Civil Law Perspective},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Legality; Proofing; Unwritten Agreements; Civil Law.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Making agreements in Indonesia can be done in written and unwritten form. This is in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract in the Civil Code. Unwritten agreements are also very often carried out in the business world because they are more efficient. However, unwritten agreements are problematic because they are very difficult to prove in civil court.Purposes of the Research: There are 2 (two) objectives in this research, namely first, to analyze the legal strength of unwritten agreements from the perspective of civil law books and second, to analyze evidence in civil courts for cases of breach of contract in unwritten agreements. Then to find the right legal solution in resolving default problems in civil court.Methods of the Research: The research method used in this research is normative juridical. This method uses literature study techniques. The type of data used comes from primary data, namely the Civil Code and legal principles, namely freedom of contract. then the secondary legal material used is in the form of previous research articles which examine the validity of unwritten agreements.Results of the Research: Based on the research results, it was found that unwritten agreements have binding legal force. However, in reality it is very difficult to prove it in court because evidence in civil law comes from written letters. Therefore, the solution that can be offered is the need for preventive and repressive legal efforts.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {109--115}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.2033},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/2033}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Journal Article

Azhar Fachrizal and Rahman, Sufirman and Khalid Hasbuddin. “Analisis Hukum Putusan No. 29/Pdt. G/2019/PN Sgm Tentang Kekuatan Pembuktian Pada Perkara Perdata.” Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021).

Hoirunnisa, Helina, and Martoyo Martoyo. “Analisis Kekuatan Hukum Pada Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Arisan Online Emas Di Kabupaten Jember.” Rechtenstudent Journal UIN KHAS Jember 3, no. 2 (2022): 160–71.

Khalid, Zuhriati. “Analisis Juridis Kedudukan Perjanjian Kemitraan Antara Pengemudi Jasa Angkutan Online Dan Perusahaan Provider Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Keperdataan.” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 18, no. 3 (2019): 114–23.

Lubis, Taufik Hidayat. “Hukum Perjanjian Di Indonesia.” SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial Dan Ekonomi 2, no. 3 (2021): 177–90.

Maramis Stephanie Nathania and Kalalo, Merry E and Mamengko Rudolf Sam. “Kajian Hukum Tentang Keabsahan Jual Beli Online Pada Aplikasi Facebook.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM 11, no. 2 (2023).

Rokilah. “The Role of the Regulations in Indonesia State System.” Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020): 29–38.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian.” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 107–20.

Suhartono, Slamet. “Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (2019): 372134.

Tan, David. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosia 8, no. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i8.2021.2463-2478.

Warouw, Jessica Esther. “Pembuktian Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Di Hadapan Pengadilan Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Rechtreglement Voor De Butengewesten.” LEX PRIVATUM 9, no. 10 (2021).

Books

Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama, 2008.

Siahaan, Rudy Haposan. Hukum Perikatan Indonesia: Teori Dan Perkembangannya. Malang: Inteligensia Media, 2017.

Tutik, Titik Triwulan. Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya, 2010.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 179 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 155 times



Copyright (c) 2024 Shenti Agustini, Febri Jaya, Shelvi Rusdiana.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.