1. Home
  2. Vol 5, No 3 (2024)
  3. Tedjokusumo

The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective

Dave David Tedjokusumo(1email), Lucianus Budi Kagramanto(2), Endang Prasetyawati(3), Krisnadi Nasution(4)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The government has made efforts to ensure that existing business competition legal regulations can accommodate the broad legal needs of society, but in reality, in everyday life, legal problems are still often encountered. One of the fundamental legal issues related to business competition in Indonesia is regarding government procurement of goods/services. There are many practices of bid rigging in the process of procuring government goods/services to determine the winner in a tender. Tender conspiracy cases often occur in Indonesia, therefore everything related to tender conspiracy must be carefully scrutinized.

Purposes of the Research: The aim of this research is to analyze and discover the nature of the prohibition on bid rigging from a business competition law perspective.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical. Descriptive and argumentative techniques must be used in carrying out the analysis.

Results of the Research: The essence of the prohibition on bid rigging from a business competition law perspective can actually be observed in Article 22 of Law no. 5/1999, Per. KPPU No. 2/2010, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XIV/2016. This prohibition aims to not give rise to unhealthy business competition, so that the aim of holding tenders can be achieved properly to provide equal opportunities to business actors in offering competitive prices and quality, which in the end will result in the lowest price with the best quality.

Keywords


Essence; Tender Rigging; Business Competition Law.


DOI


10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093

Published


2024-11-29

How To Cite


APA: Tedjokusumo, D.D., Kagramanto, L.B., Prasetyawati, E., & Nasution, K. (2024). The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective. Batulis Civil Law Review, 5(3), 146-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093.
IEEE: D.D. Tedjokusumo, L.B. Kagramanto, E. Prasetyawati, and K. Nasution, "The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 146-155, Nov. 2024. Accessed on: Mar. 31, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093
Harvard: Tedjokusumo, D.D., Kagramanto, L.B., Prasetyawati, E., and Nasution, K., (2024). "The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 5(3), pp. 146-155. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093 (Accessed on: 31 March 2025)
Chicago: Tedjokusumo, Dave David, Lucianus Budi Kagramanto, Endang Prasetyawati, and Krisnadi Nasution. "The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review 5, no. 3 (November 25, 2024): 146-155. Accessed March 31, 2025. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093
Vancouver: Tedjokusumo DD, Kagramanto LB, Prasetyawati E, Nasution K. The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2024 Nov 29 [cited 2025 Mar 31];5(3):146-155. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093
MLA 8th: Tedjokusumo, Dave David, Lucianus Budi Kagramanto, Endang Prasetyawati, and Krisnadi Nasution. "The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 5, no. 3, 25 Nov. 2024, pp. 146-155, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093. Accessed 31 Mar. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{BALLREV2093,
		author = {Dave Tedjokusumo and Lucianus Kagramanto and Endang Prasetyawati and Krisnadi Nasution},
		title = {The Essence of the Prohibition of Tender Rigging from a Business Competition Law Perspective},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {5},
		number = {3},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Essence; Tender Rigging; Business Competition Law.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The government has made efforts to ensure that existing business competition legal regulations can accommodate the broad legal needs of society, but in reality, in everyday life, legal problems are still often encountered. One of the fundamental legal issues related to business competition in Indonesia is regarding government procurement of goods/services. There are many practices of bid rigging in the process of procuring government goods/services to determine the winner in a tender. Tender conspiracy cases often occur in Indonesia, therefore everything related to tender conspiracy must be carefully scrutinized. Purposes of the Research: The aim of this research is to analyze and discover the nature of the prohibition on bid rigging from a business competition law perspective.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical. Descriptive and argumentative techniques must be used in carrying out the analysis.Results of the Research: The essence of the prohibition on bid rigging from a business competition law perspective can actually be observed in Article 22 of Law no. 5/1999, Per. KPPU No. 2/2010, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XIV/2016. This prohibition aims to not give rise to unhealthy business competition, so that the aim of holding tenders can be achieved properly to provide equal opportunities to business actors in offering competitive prices and quality, which in the end will result in the lowest price with the best quality.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {146--155}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2093},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/2093}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Journal Article

Antoni, Veri. "Law Enforcement in Cartel Cases Outside of Tender Rigging in Indonesia." Pulpit Law - Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University 31, no. 1 (2019): 96. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.37966.

Asmah, Asmah. "Implementation of Fine Sanctions in National Road Tender Conspiracy Cases." Judicial Journal 12, no. 2 (September 2019): 198. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.280.

Bakti, Surya, and Zainal Asikin. "The Existence of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Handling Tender Rigging from a Positive Indonesian Legal Perspective" 3, no. 2 (2020): 261. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v3i2.1953.

Febrina, Rezmia. "Business Competition in the Digital Era According to a Business Competition Law Perspective." Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Work (JURKIM) 2, no. 1 (2022): 121. https://doi.org/10.31849/jurkim.v2i1.9309.

Maheswari, Alya Anindita. "Limitations, Authority and Involvement of the KPPU in Tender Rigging Cases According to Business Competition Law." Jurist-Diction 3, no. 5 (2020): 1581. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i5.21967.

Pane, Moses Darwin. "Legal Aspects of Procurement of Government Goods and Services, a Juridical Review of Regulations for Procurement of Government Goods and Services." Legal Media Journal 24, no. 2 (2017): 148. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0090.147-155.

Prasetya, Hendi Indra, and Danang Wahyu Muhammad. "Evidence in Settlement of Tender Conspiracy Cases." Media of Law and Sharia 3, no. 1 (2022): 21. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i1.13223.

Sirait, Resmaya Agnesia Mutiara. "Prohibition of Conspiratorial Actions in Tenders Based on Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition." Tanjungpura Law Journal 4, no. 2 (2020): 181. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v4i2.33980.

Book

Ibrahim, Johnny. Business Competition Law (Philosophy, Theory, and Implications of Its Application in Indonesia). Malang: Bayu Media, 2006.

Rokan, Mutafa Kamal. Business Competition Law (Theory and Practice in Indonesia). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Suhasril and Mohammad Taufik Makarao. Law Prohibiting Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 192 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 110 times



Copyright (c) 2024 Dave David Tedjokusumo, Lucianus Budi Kagramanto, Endang Prasetyawati, Krisnadi Nasution

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0