Legal Protection For Notaries Against False Information Given By Participants In The Drafting of Authentic Deeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i3.2828Keywords:
Legal Protection, Notary, False Information.Abstract
Introduction: A problem that often occurs in connection with the implementation of the duties of a Notary is if there is a Notarial deed that is faulted by the parties, especially if the parties come to the Notary with false information or fake evidence.
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the validity of a notary's statement which is based on evidence that is declared to be fake and legal protection for notaries for fake statements.
Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research methods by looking for solutions and legal issues that arise, which will be achieved and then provide predictions. Legal approach and conceptual approach, with primary and secondary legal materials.
Results of the Research: Based on Supreme Court Decision Number 702/J/Sip/1973 dated September 5 1973, the Notary who recorded what was shown and conveyed by the person facing, there is no obligation for the notary to investigate materially. In this way, the Notary is not asked to be held responsible for losses incurred because the parties provided false information.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Journal Article
Afifah, Kunni. “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Lex Renaissance 2, no. 1 (2017): 147–61.
Aini, Nur, and Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Keterangan Palsu Yang Disampaikan Penghadap Dalam Akta Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2019): 105–16.
Dewi, Wulan Wiryantari, and Ibrahim R. “Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 5, no. 3 (2020): 436–45. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i03.p01.
Gumanti, Retna. “Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian (Ditinjau Dari KUHPerdata).” Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu 5, no. 01 (2012): 1–12. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/900.
Hendra, Rahmad. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu Di Kota Pekanbaru.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2012): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i01.1029.
Islam, Mitha Irza Noor El, Sukirno, and Adya Paramita Prabandari. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Atas Akta Yang Dibuatnya Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana.” Notarius 14, no. 2 (2021): 892–904. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43780.
Lalita, Ni Made, Sri Devi, and I Ketut Westra. “Akibat Hukum Serta Sanksi Pemalsuan Yang Dilakukan Notaris Kepada Penghadap Ketika Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 6, no. 02 (2021): 248–58. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i02.p03.
Mamuaja, Justino Armando. “Penerapan Pasal 242 Kuhpidana Terhadap Pemberian Keterangan Palsu Di Atas Sumpah.” Lex Crimen 3, no. 2 (2014): 12–21. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/4541.
Mowoka, Valentine Phebe. “Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” LEX ET SOCIETATIS 2, no. 4 (2014): 59–67.
Mubarak, Alda, Sukirno, and Irawati. “Perlindungan Hukum Para Pihak Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Yang Berstatus Tersangka.” Notarius 13, no. 1 (2020): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29159.
Pramono, Dedy. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 3 (2015): 248–58.
Rositawati, Desy, I Made Arya, and Desak Putu Dewi Kasih. “Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris Secara Elektronik Dalam Kaitan Cyber Notary.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2017): 172–82.
S, Laurensius Arliman. “Pemanggilan Notaris Dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Paska Perubahan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Justitia et Pax 32, no. 1 (2016): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v32i1.758.
Sasauw, Christin. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kekuatan Mengikat Suatu Akta Notaris.” Lex Privatum 3, no. 1 (2015): 98–109. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7030.
Siahaan, Kartini. “Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana.” Recital Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 72–88. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/7455.
Wulandari, Anak Agung Deby. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Batalnya Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Karena Cacat Hukum.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 3 (2018): 436–45. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i03.p04.
Book
Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.
Lamintang, P. A. F, and Theo Lamintang. Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Membahayakan Kepercayaan Umum Terhadap Surat, Alat Pembayaran, Alat Bukti, Dan Peradilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Adya Bakti, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jane Maria Octavia, Ana Silviana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licence Terms: Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
