Equivalence of Protection for Foreign and Domestic Creditors in Debt Restructuring Based on Positive Indonesian Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v6i2.2918Keywords:
Debt Restructuring, Foreign Creditors, Bankruptcy Law, Legal Protection.Abstract
Introduction: This article analyzes the legal implications of excluding foreign creditors in corporate debt restructuring in Indonesia. The study highlights the challenges faced by foreign creditors in securing their rights within the Indonesian legal framework, particularly in bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation (PKPU) proceedings. The case of PT Visi Media Asia serves as a reference to illustrate these challenges and their legal consequences.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine the legal impact of excluding foreign creditors in debt restructuring processes and to compare their legal position with domestic creditors under Indonesian law. By identifying regulatory gaps and inconsistencies, this study aims to provide recommendations for improving creditor protection and ensuring equal treatment in debt resolution mechanisms.
Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. Legal materials are collected through document studies, including legislation, court rulings, and scholarly literature. The qualitative analysis is applied to interpret legal norms and evaluate their implementation in real cases, particularly focusing on the case of PT Visi Media Asia.
Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia's current legal framework does not fully safeguard foreign creditors in debt restructuring, often favoring domestic creditors in judicial and regulatory practices. The study contributes to the discourse on legal reform by recommending clearer regulations and stricter enforcement to ensure fairness in debt restructuring, fostering investor confidence in Indonesia’s financial system.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Alfianti, Mutiara Bella, and Wiwin Yulianingsih. “Analisis Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dalam Kepailitan Lintas Batas Di Indonesia Dengan Korea Selatan” 3, no. 3 (2023).
Allivah, Andini Nurul. “Analisis Perlindungan Kreditor Asing Dalam Persoalan Kepailitan Berdasarkan Hukum Posistif Indonesia (Studi Kasus Terkait Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat 7/PDT.SUSPKPU/2016/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST JO. Putusan Mahkamah Agung 482K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2016).” Undergraduated Thesis, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2024.
Amboro, F Yudhi Priyo. “Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Amerika Serikat Dan Inggris.” Lex Prudentium Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.6.
Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo. “Restrukturisasi Utang Terhadap Perusahaan Go Public Dalam Kepailitan Dan PKPU.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1 (January 2020).
Aprita, Serlika. Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Makassar: Pena Indis, 2016.
Asra. Key Concept Kepailitan Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2024.
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2018.
Haspada, Deny. “Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Dalam Kebangkrutan: Studi Komparatif Antara Indonesia Dan Negara-Negara Asean.” AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional 5, no. 1 (2023).
Hutajulu, Marihot Janpieter. “Kajian Yuridis Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Perkara Kepailitan.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p175-192.
Ilmy, Besty Dyah Qorina, Iswi Hariyani, and Bhim Prakoso. “Kedudukan Kreditor Asing Dalam Perkara Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Terhadap Debitor Yang Berkedudukan Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Yustitia 7, no. 2 (December 2023): 163–80.
Levinthal, Louis Edward. The Early History Of Bankruptcy Law. Dublin: Creative Media Partners, 2022.
Mantili, Rai, and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. “Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Terkait Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Aktual Justice 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i1.618.
Saija, Ronald. Perspektif Pailit Dalam Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2024.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Usman, Rachmadi. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Beracara Di Pengadilan Niaga. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2023.
Utami, Nabil Ratu, Tri Nadia, Samuel Paranna, Nyulistiowati Suryani, and Deviana Yuanitasari. “Strategi Restrukturisasi Utang Dalam Kasus Garuda Indonesia: Pendekatan PKPU.” DOKTRINA Journal of Law 7, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v7i1.10939.
Yitawati, Krista, Pujiyono, and Adi Sulistiyono. Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dikha Anugrah, Suwari Akhamddhian, Sri Mulyani, Uche Nnawulezi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licence Terms: Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
