Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian
)
(1) , Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Prior to a business transaction, initial negotiations are usually carried out. Negotiation is a process of trying to reach an agreement with other parties. Negotiation is also an instrument that bridges the various interests of business actors in formulating their rights and obligations. It is in this negotiation that the bargaining process takes place. The next stage is the making of a memorandum of understanding, which in this writing is abbreviated as MoU. This study aims to examine whether the MoU can be used as a preliminary agreement as well as the legal strength of the MoU in terms of contract law. This research methodology uses normative legal tracing, primary and secondary legal materials with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the research results, in a business contract, the negotiations carried out by the parties are outlined in the MoU as the initial agreement. If in the preliminary agreement stage there is a cancellation unilaterally, then as a legal consequence, the party making the cancellation must be responsible for the losses incurred. This form of responsibility is in the form of refunding costs incurred during negotiations and compensation for lost opportunities to enter into contracts with third parties.
Keywords
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV451,
author = {Ronald Sopamena},
title = {Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian},
journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Legal Force; Momerandum of Understanding; Legal Agreement},
abstract = {Prior to a business transaction, initial negotiations are usually carried out. Negotiation is a process of trying to reach an agreement with other parties. Negotiation is also an instrument that bridges the various interests of business actors in formulating their rights and obligations. It is in this negotiation that the bargaining process takes place. The next stage is the making of a memorandum of understanding, which in this writing is abbreviated as MoU. This study aims to examine whether the MoU can be used as a preliminary agreement as well as the legal strength of the MoU in terms of contract law. This research methodology uses normative legal tracing, primary and secondary legal materials with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the research results, in a business contract, the negotiations carried out by the parties are outlined in the MoU as the initial agreement. If in the preliminary agreement stage there is a cancellation unilaterally, then as a legal consequence, the party making the cancellation must be responsible for the losses incurred. This form of responsibility is in the form of refunding costs incurred during negotiations and compensation for lost opportunities to enter into contracts with third parties.},
issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {1--15} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/451}
}
Agustina, R., Suharnoko, Nieuwenhuis, H., & Hijma, J. (2012). Hukum Perikatan (Law of Obligations). Pustaka Larasan.
Budiono, H. (2006). Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fuady, M. (1999). Hukum Kontrak, Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Prenada Media Group.
Hetharie, Y. (2019). Perjanjian Nominee sebagai Sarana Penguasaan Hak Milik atas Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. SASI, 25(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.147
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.147
Kunarso, & Sumaryanto, A. D. (2020). Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
Mandasari, Z. (2013). Kedudukan Memorandum of Understanding dan Surat Keputusan Bersama Ditinjau dari Teori Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(2), 278-299. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss2.art6
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss2.art6
Marbun, B. N. (2009). Membuat Perjanjian yang Aman dan Sesuai Hukum. Puspa Swara.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum,. Kencana. https://doi.org/340.072
Miru, A. (2018). Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak. Rajawali Pers.
Muhammad, A. K. (1990). Hukum Perikatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Satrio, J. (1993). Hukum Perikatan (Perikatan Pada Umumnya). Alumni.
Simamora, Y. S. (2009). Hukum Perjanjian ; (Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa oleh Pemerintah). LaksBang Pressindo.
Simanjuntak, R. (2011). Hukum Kontrak: Teknik Perancangan Kontrak Bisnis. Publishing.
Subekti. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa, Jakarta.
Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, M. Y. (2010). Teori Hukum : Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Genta Publishing.
Tjoanda, M., Hetharie, Y., Pariela, M. V. G., & Sopamena, R. F. (2021). Covid-19 sebagai Bentuk Overmacht dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit. SASI, 27(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447
Widjaja, G. (2017). The Application and Implementtation of MOU in Indonesian Business Practices. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 13(4), 60-64. https://www.ijbel.com/previous-issues/august-2017/vol-13-august-2017-issue-4-law/
Wignojodiputro, S. (1995). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Gunung Agung.
Yuanitasari, D., & Kusmayanti, H. (2020). Pengembangan Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Itikad Baik Pada Tahap Prakontraktual. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(2), 292-304. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/228
: 5778 times
Download : 5665 times
Cited-By:
1. Metaverse Land Purchasing in Agreement Legal Perspective
Ronald Fadly Sopamena
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 4 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Mediasi Sebagai Penyelesaian Sengketa Cerai
Ronald Fadly Sopamena
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 2 issue: 2 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
3. Default in The Profit Sharing Agreement Between the State Government and Petuanan Areas
Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, Merry Tjoanda, Ronald Fadly Sopamena
SASI vol: 27 issue: 4 first page: 444 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451
Copyright (c) 2021 Ronald Fadly Sopamena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Metaverse Land Purchasing in Agreement Legal Perspective
Ronald Fadly Sopamena
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 4 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Mediasi Sebagai Penyelesaian Sengketa Cerai
Ronald Fadly Sopamena
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 2 issue: 2 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
3. Default in The Profit Sharing Agreement Between the State Government and Petuanan Areas
Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, Merry Tjoanda, Ronald Fadly Sopamena
SASI vol: 27 issue: 4 first page: 444 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
