Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia

Elisa Sugito(1email), Erwin Syahruddin(2)


(1) Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Patent protection in a country cannot be separated from the registration system adopted in that country. In the United States the patent registration system is based on the first-to-invent principle. Even though the United States uses the first-to-invent principle, the United States also regulates protection requirements as European countries, Japan and Indonesia are in the form of new discoveries, containing inventive steps, and can be applied in industry. Meanwhile in Indonesia, the patent protection system used is the first to file system, which is a system that grants patent rights to those who first register a new invention in accordance with the requirements. The purpose of this research is to study and analyze the comparative history of the patent registration system in the United States with the patent registration system in Indonesia. The type of research method used is normative legal research with a comparative law approach and a legal history approach. The results of the study found that patent protection in European countries, the United States, Japan and Indonesia has similarities in protection requirements that regulate novelty, inventive steps, and industrial applications.


Keywords


Patent Protection; Patent Registration; Patent System

How To Cite


APA: Sugito, E., & Syahruddin, E. (2021). Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2(1), 16-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459.
IEEE: E. Sugito, and E. Syahruddin, "Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16-23, May. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459
Harvard: Sugito, E., and Syahruddin, E., (2021). "Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 2(1), pp. 16-23. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459 (Accessed on: 19 April 2024)
Chicago: Sugito, Elisa, and Erwin Syahruddin. "Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia." Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 1 (May 31, 2021): 16-23. Accessed April 19, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459
Vancouver: Sugito E, Syahruddin E. Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2021 May 31 [cited 2024 Apr 19];2(1):16-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459
MLA 8th: Sugito, Elisa, and Erwin Syahruddin. "Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1, 31 May. 2021, pp. 16-23, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459. Accessed 19 Apr. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{BALLREV459,
		author = {Elisa Sugito and Erwin Syahruddin},
		title = {Sejarah Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Paten Di Amerika Serikat Dengan Di Indonesia},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {2},
		number = {1},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Patent Protection; Patent Registration; Patent System},
		abstract = {Patent protection in a country cannot be separated from the registration system adopted in that country. In the United States the patent registration system is based on the first-to-invent principle. Even though the United States uses the first-to-invent principle, the United States also regulates protection requirements as European countries, Japan and Indonesia are in the form of new discoveries, containing inventive steps, and can be applied in industry. Meanwhile in Indonesia, the patent protection system used is the first to file system, which is a system that grants patent rights to those who first register a new invention in accordance with the requirements. The purpose of this research is to study and analyze the comparative history of the patent registration system in the United States with the patent registration system in Indonesia. The type of research method used is normative legal research with a comparative law approach and a legal history approach. The results of the study found that patent protection in European countries, the United States, Japan and Indonesia has similarities in protection requirements that regulate novelty, inventive steps, and industrial applications.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {16--23}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/459}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2009). Hak Milik Intelektual, Sejarah, Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Foster, F. H., & Shook, R. L. (1993). Patents,Copyrights & Trademarks. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Gautama, S., & Winata, R. (1998). Pembaharuan Undang-Undang Paten 1997. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Glendon, M. A., Gordon, M. W., & Carozza, P. G. (2016). Comparative Legal Traditions : In A Nutshell. West Academic Publishing.

Hadiarianti, V. S. (2015). Memahami Hukum Atas Karya Intelektual. UNIKA ATMAJAYA.

Japan Patent Office. (2001). Comparative Study on the Japanese, the United States and the European Patent Systems (JIII; Asia-Pacific Industrial Property Center).

Kaufer, E. (1989). The Economics of the Patent System. Harwood Academic Publisher.

Labetubun, Muchtar A H, & Fataruba, S. (2016). Peralihan Hak Cipta Kepada Ahli Waris Menurut Hukum Perdata. SASI, 22(2), 1-11. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/163

Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. (2018). Aspek Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Buku Elektronik (E-Book) Sebagai Karya Kekayaan Intelektual. SASI, 24(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.128
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.128

Mamudji, S., Rahardjo, H., Supriyanto, A., Erny, D., & Pudji Simatupang, D. (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2000). Luasnya Perlindungan Paten, dalam Kapita Selekta Hak Kekayaan Intelektual I. Pusat Studi Hukum UII Yogyakarta Bekerja Sama dengan Yayasan Klinik HAKI Jakarta.

Maulana, I. B. (1999). Penerapan Paten Sejak UU Paten No. 6 Tahun 1989 Hingga UU Paten No. 13 Tahun 1997: Pengalaman Indonesia Selama Ini. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 6(12), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art1
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art1

Mossof, A. (2001). Rethinking the Development of Patents: An Intellectual History 1550-1800. Hastings Law Journal, 52(6), 1255-1322. https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol52/iss6/2/

Yodo, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Paten (Studi Komparatif Lingkup Perlindungandi Beragai Negara). FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 587-814. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.821

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 6371 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 2618 times

 

Cited-By:

 

1. IJALS SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: Technological Advancement for Social Welfare: Contemporary Development and the Future Impact
Waspiah Waspiah, Budi Santoso, Paramita Prananingtyas, Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri, Ridwan Arifin
Paper Title: Technological advancement on patent registration in Indonesia  
first page: 030023  year: 2022  
Type: Book [View Source]



DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.459

Copyright (c) 2021 Elisa Sugito, Erwin Syahruddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. IJALS SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: Technological Advancement for Social Welfare: Contemporary Development and the Future Impact
Waspiah Waspiah, Budi Santoso, Paramita Prananingtyas, Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri, Ridwan Arifin
Paper Title: Technological advancement on patent registration in Indonesia  
first page: 030023  year: 2022  
Type: Book [View Source]