1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
  3. Bakung

Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China

Dolot Al Hasni Bakung(1email), Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar(2), Nabih Amer(3)


(1) Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo, Indonesia orcid
(2) Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Covid-19 as a pandemic in the 20th century has brought consequences in many aspects, one of which is the force major aspect. The force majeure policy in Indonesia is still incomplete, unlike China, which already has a more complete policy. The purpose of the research is to be able to find out about the Covid-19 policy in Indonesia and to compare the Indonesian and Chinese force major policy settings. The research method uses a normative research type with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that Indonesia's policy in dealing with covid 19 has problems in two policies, namely: the provision of information and the Lockdown policy. Meanwhile, the comparison problem with China is better by providing a mechanism with more legal certainty, namely providing access to the determination of force major against the Supreme Court, while Indonesia does not have a similar mechanism.

Keywords


Covid-19; Force Majeure; Indonesia; China


DOI


10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721

Published


2022-05-16

How To Cite


APA: Bakung, D.A., Muhtar, M.H., & Amer, N. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(1), 8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721.
IEEE: D.A. Bakung, M.H. Muhtar, and N. Amer, "Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8-18, May. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721
Harvard: Bakung, D.A., Muhtar, M.H., and Amer, N., (2022). "Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 3(1), pp. 8-18. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721 (Accessed on: 30 April 2025)
Chicago: Bakung, Dolot Al Hasni, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, and Nabih Amer. "Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China." Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 1 (May 16, 2022): 8-18. Accessed April 30, 2025. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721
Vancouver: Bakung DA, Muhtar MH, Amer N. Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 May 16 [cited 2025 Apr 30];3(1):8-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721
MLA 8th: Bakung, Dolot Al Hasni, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, and Nabih Amer. "Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 16 May. 2022, pp. 8-18, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{BALLREV721,
		author = {Dolot Bakung and Mohamad Muhtar and Nabih Amer},
		title = {Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {3},
		number = {1},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Covid-19; Force Majeure; Indonesia; China},
		abstract = {Covid-19 as a pandemic in the 20th century has brought consequences in many aspects, one of which is the force major aspect. The force majeure policy in Indonesia is still incomplete, unlike China, which already has a more complete policy. The purpose of the research is to be able to find out about the Covid-19 policy in Indonesia and to compare the Indonesian and Chinese force major policy settings. The research method uses a normative research type with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that Indonesia's policy in dealing with covid 19 has problems in two policies, namely: the provision of information and the Lockdown policy. Meanwhile, the comparison problem with China is better by providing a mechanism with more legal certainty, namely providing access to the determination of force major against the Supreme Court, while Indonesia does not have a similar mechanism.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {8--18}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/721}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Adhari, A. (2019). Ambiguitas Pengaturan Keadaan Bahaya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, 11(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v11i1.1960

Adonara, F. F. (2014). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perikatan. Mandar Maju.

Andrianti, W. P., Santoso, B., & Prasetyo, M. H. (2021). Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Justifikasi Force Majeure dalam Kontrak Bisnis. NOTARIUS, 14(2), 739–756.

Berger, K. P., & Behm, D. (2020). Force Majeure and Hardship in the Age of Corona: A Historical and Comparative Study. McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, 6(4), 78–130. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575869

Bramasta, D. B. (2020). Menyelisik Tugas dan Fungsi Gugus Tugas Percepatan Penanganan Covid-19 yang Dibubarkan Jokowi. KOMPAS.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/07/22/124500765/menyelisik-tugas-dan-fungsi-gugus-tugas-percepatan-penanganan-covid-19-yang

Commission, E. (2018). Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council: addressing situations of crisis and force majeure in the field of migration and asylum.

Grace, D. L. (2001). Force Majeure, China & (and) The CISG: Is China’s New Contract Law a Step in the Right Direction. SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 2(1), 173–207.

Herbots, J. H. (2021). Covid-19 and contracts in China and Europe. China-EU Law Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-021-00091-5

Ishaq, H. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Alfabeta.

Liu, J. Y., & Bai, C. (2020). Coronavirus in the Chinese Law Context: Force Majeure and Material Adverse Change. Pillsburylaw.Com. https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/coronavirus-in-the-chinese-law-context-force-majeure-and-material-adverse-change.html

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum,. Kencana.

Miru, A. (2016). Hukum Perikatan: Penjelasan Makna Pasal 1233 sampai 1456 BW. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sukarmi. (2008). Cyber Law: Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Bayang-Bayang Pelaku Usaha. Pusaka Sastra.

Tuwu, D., Laksmono, B. S., Huraerah, A., & Harjudin, L. O. (2021). Dinamika Kebijakan Penanganan Pandemi COVID-19 Dalam Perspektif Kesejahteraan Sosial. SOSIO KONSEPSIA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 10(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v10i2.2158

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1897 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1000 times

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Termination of the contract by the breaching party in Civil Code of China
JingFei Qi, Bolot Toktobaev, Qian Zhang
Social Legal Studios  vol: 6  issue: 4  first page: 183  year: 2023  
Type: Journal [View Source]

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Comparative Analysis of Legal Policies Regarding Force Major During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and China
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Dolot Al Hasni Bakung; Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo; Indonesia orcid
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar; Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Nabih Amer; Faculty of Law Negeri Gorontalo University, Gorontalo; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Covid-19; Force Majeure; Indonesia; China
 
4. Description Abstract Covid-19 as a pandemic in the 20th century has brought consequences in many aspects, one of which is the force major aspect. The force majeure policy in Indonesia is still incomplete, unlike China, which already has a more complete policy. The purpose of the research is to be able to find out about the Covid-19 policy in Indonesia and to compare the Indonesian and Chinese force major policy settings. The research method uses a normative research type with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that Indonesia's policy in dealing with covid 19 has problems in two policies, namely: the provision of information and the Lockdown policy. Meanwhile, the comparison problem with China is better by providing a mechanism with more legal certainty, namely providing access to the determination of force major against the Supreme Court, while Indonesia does not have a similar mechanism.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-05-16
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/721
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.721
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 3, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, MEI 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Copyright (c) 2022 Dolot Al Hasni Bakung, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Nabih Amer

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Termination of the contract by the breaching party in Civil Code of China
JingFei Qi, Bolot Toktobaev, Qian Zhang
Social Legal Studios  vol: 6  issue: 4  first page: 183  year: 2023  
Type: Journal [View Source]