Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama

Haeratun Haeratun; Fatahullah Fatahullah

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama

Haeratun Haeratun⁽¹⁾, Fatahullah Fatahullah⁽²⁾

(1) Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution that has grown and developed along with the growing human desire to resolve disputes quickly and also to satisfy the litigants. The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to divorce cases at the Mataram Religious Courts and the Praya Religious Courts NTB. The research method includes the type empirical/socio legal research, while the approach used is a socio legal approach. The results of this study are that the success rate of mediating divorce cases at the Mataram religious court and the Praya religious court is still very low because there are still many mediator judges in the religious court who have not been certified so that they do not have the skills to seek peace for the parties, in addition to inadequate facilities and infrastructure.

Keywords

Mediation; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Win-Win Solution; Ishlah

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

Published

2022-05-16

How To Cite

APA: Haeratun, H., & Fatahullah, F. (2022). Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(1), 29-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930.

IEEE: H. Haeratun, and F. Fatahullah, "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29-59, May. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

Harvard: Haeratun, H., and Fatahullah, F., (2022). "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 3(1), pp. 29-59. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930 (Accessed on: 30 April 2025)

Chicago: Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama." Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 1 (May 16, 2022): 29-59. Accessed April 30, 2025. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

Vancouver: Haeratun H, Fatahullah F. Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 May 16 [cited 2025 Apr 30];3(1):29-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

MLA 8th: Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 16 May. 2022, pp. 29-59, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV930,
		author = {Haeratun Haeratun and Fatahullah Fatahullah},
		title = {Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {3},
		number = {1},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Mediation; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Win-Win Solution; Ishlah},
		abstract = {Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution that has grown and developed along with the growing human desire to resolve disputes quickly and also to satisfy the litigants. The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to divorce cases at the Mataram Religious Courts and the Praya Religious Courts NTB. The research method includes the type empirical/socio legal research, while the approach used is a socio legal approach. The results of this study are that the success rate of mediating divorce cases at the Mataram religious court and the Praya religious court is still very low because there are still many mediator judges in the religious court who have not been certified so that they do not have the skills to seek peace for the parties, in addition to inadequate facilities and infrastructure.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {29--59}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/930}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Al-Qurthubi, A. A. (1960). Al-Jami’ Al-Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar Al-Kutub.

Astarini, D. R. S. (2013). Mediasi Pengadilan Salah Satu Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Berdasarkan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Biaya Ringan. Alumni.

E. Tiezzi, N. M., & Rosini, M. (2003). Extending the Environmental Wisdom Beyond The scenario: Ecodynamic Analysis and The Learning Community. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 63, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO030321

Friedman, L. M. (1977). Law and Socety. Printice Kall.

Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.

Hartawati, A. (2019). Penyelesaian Perkara Melalui Mediasi: Sebuah Resolusi Konflik Keluarga. Manggu.

Irianto, S., Oto, J. M., Pompe, S., Bedner, A. W., Vel, J., Stoter, S., & Arnscheidt, J. (2012). Kajian Sosio-Legal. Pustaka Larasan.

Kansil, C. S. . (2007). Latihan Ujian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Sinar Grafika.

Mamudji, S. (2004). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 34(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol34.no3.1440

Manan, A. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Manan, B. (2014). Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa. UII Press.

Margono, H. (2019). Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.

Nolan-Haley, J. (2013). Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Nutshell. West Academic Publishing.

Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Prenada Media Group.

Purbacaraka, P., & Soekanto, S. (1993). Perihal Kaedah Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Runtung. (2006). Pemberdayaan Mediasi Sebagai alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Saifullah, M. (2014). Integrasi Mediasi Kasus Perceraian Dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Ahkam, 24(2), 243–262.

Soekanto, S. (1991). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Syukur, F. A. (2012). Mediasi Yudisial di Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Usman, R. (2012). Mediasi di Pengadilan dan Teori dan Praktik. Sinar Grafika.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 3828 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 2497 times

Cited-By:

1. STRATEGI MEDIATOR NON HAKIM UNTUK MENCAPAI KEBERHASILAN DALAM MEDIASI PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BANGIL
Savvy Dian Faizzati
al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam vol: 12 issue: 2 first page: 190 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Haeratun Haeratun; Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Fatahullah Fatahullah; Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Mediation; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Win-Win Solution; Ishlah

4.	Description	Abstract	Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution that has grown and developed along with the growing human desire to resolve disputes quickly and also to satisfy the litigants. The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to divorce cases at the Mataram Religious Courts and the Praya Religious Courts NTB. The research method includes the type empirical/socio legal research, while the approach used is a socio legal approach. The results of this study are that the success rate of mediating divorce cases at the Mataram religious court and the Praya religious court is still very low because there are still many mediator judges in the religious court who have not been certified so that they do not have the skills to seek peace for the parties, in addition to inadequate facilities and infrastructure.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2022-05-16

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/930

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 3, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, MEI 2022

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.