Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama

Haeratun Haeratun(1email), Fatahullah Fatahullah(2)


(1) Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram
(2) Faculty of Law Mataram University, Mataram
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution that has grown and developed along with the growing human desire to resolve disputes quickly and also to satisfy the litigants. The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to divorce cases at the Mataram Religious Courts and the Praya Religious Courts NTB. The research method includes the type empirical/socio legal research, while the approach used is a socio legal approach. The results of this study are that the success rate of mediating divorce cases at the Mataram religious court and the Praya religious court is still very low because there are still many mediator judges in the religious court who have not been certified so that they do not have the skills to seek peace for the parties, in addition to inadequate facilities and infrastructure.

Keywords


Mediation; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Win-Win Solution; Ishlah

How To Cite


APA: Haeratun, H., & Fatahullah, F. (2022). Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(1), 29-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930.
IEEE: H. Haeratun, and F. Fatahullah, "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29-59, May. 2022. Accessed on: Jan. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930
Harvard: Haeratun, H., and Fatahullah, F., (2022). "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 3(1), pp. 29-59. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930 (Accessed on: 31 January 2023)
Chicago: Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama." Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 1 (May 16, 2022): 29-59. Accessed January 31, 2023. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930
Vancouver: Haeratun H, Fatahullah F. Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 May 16 [cited 2023 Jan 31];3(1):29-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930
MLA 8th: Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 16 May. 2022, pp. 29-59, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930. Accessed 31 Jan. 2023.
BibTeX:
@article{BALLREV930,
		author = {Haeratun Haeratun and Fatahullah Fatahullah},
		title = {Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {3},
		number = {1},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Mediation; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Win-Win Solution; Ishlah},
		abstract = {Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution that has grown and developed along with the growing human desire to resolve disputes quickly and also to satisfy the litigants. The purpose of the study was to determine and analyze the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to divorce cases at the Mataram Religious Courts and the Praya Religious Courts NTB. The research method includes the type empirical/socio legal research, while the approach used is a socio legal approach. The results of this study are that the success rate of mediating divorce cases at the Mataram religious court and the Praya religious court is still very low because there are still many mediator judges in the religious court who have not been certified so that they do not have the skills to seek peace for the parties, in addition to inadequate facilities and infrastructure.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {29--59}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/930}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Al-Qurthubi, A. A. (1960). Al-Jami’ Al-Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar Al-Kutub.

Astarini, D. R. S. (2013). Mediasi Pengadilan Salah Satu Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Berdasarkan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Biaya Ringan. Alumni.

E. Tiezzi, N. M., & Rosini, M. (2003). Extending the Environmental Wisdom Beyond The scenario: Ecodynamic Analysis and The Learning Community. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 63, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO030321

Friedman, L. M. (1977). Law and Socety. Printice Kall.

Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.

Hartawati, A. (2019). Penyelesaian Perkara Melalui Mediasi: Sebuah Resolusi Konflik Keluarga. Manggu.

Irianto, S., Oto, J. M., Pompe, S., Bedner, A. W., Vel, J., Stoter, S., & Arnscheidt, J. (2012). Kajian Sosio-Legal. Pustaka Larasan.

Kansil, C. S. . (2007). Latihan Ujian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Sinar Grafika.

Mamudji, S. (2004). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 34(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol34.no3.1440

Manan, A. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Manan, B. (2014). Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa. UII Press.

Margono, H. (2019). Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.

Nolan-Haley, J. (2013). Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Nutshell. West Academic Publishing.

Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Prenada Media Group.

Purbacaraka, P., & Soekanto, S. (1993). Perihal Kaedah Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Runtung. (2006). Pemberdayaan Mediasi Sebagai alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Saifullah, M. (2014). Integrasi Mediasi Kasus Perceraian Dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Ahkam, 24(2), 243–262.

Soekanto, S. (1991). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Syukur, F. A. (2012). Mediasi Yudisial di Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Usman, R. (2012). Mediasi di Pengadilan dan Teori dan Praktik. Sinar Grafika.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 929 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 637 times



DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930



Copyright (c) 2022 Haeratun Haeratun, Fatahullah Fatahullah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.