Status Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Adat Marga dalam Kebijakan Penataan Aset Reforma Agraria Di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara

Authors

  • Ronald Saija Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Fransiscus X. V. R Letsoin Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Rory Jeff Akyuwen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Pieter Radjawane Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.246

Keywords:

Communal Rights, Asset Arrangement, Recognition, Agrarian Reform

Abstract

Promulgation of Law Number 5 of 1960, brought its own consequences in terms of regulation of agrarian resources, including earth, water, space and natural resources contained therein. The ideals of the law in the realization of the objectives of the national agrarian law are realized in the form of the Agrarian Reform policy which is one of the ideals in the administration of President Joko Widodo. This policy was stated in the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number IX / MPR / 2001 concerning Agrarian Reform and Natural Resource Management and followed up with the issuance of Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform. The Presidential Regulation regulates the determination of assets in the legalization of agrarian reform land object certificates. However, the problem is that it is feared that disputes and agrarian conflicts will arise in the right of recognition of the existence of communal rights for indigenous and tribal peoples explicitly mentioned in Ministerial Regulation ATR / Ka.BPN Number 10 of 2016, which seems to be no longer recognized by indigenous peoples in Indonesia. This paper is a legal research that uses the method of the statutory approach and conceptual approach that examines the recognition and use of customary land by using the norms contained in legislation. The results of this paper are directed to be able to provide clarity of legalization of customary community land as well as communal rights of indigenous and tribal peoples related to the issuance of Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 which does not expressly state the position of indigenous peoples as the subject of policy arrangement on Agrarian Reform assets, so that the rights owned by marga indigenous and tribal peoples can be fought for.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Buku

[1] Hajati, Sri, dkk. (2018). Politik hukum pertanahan, Surabaya: Airlangga Univeritas Press.

[2] Sembiring, Rosnidar. (2017), Hukum pertanahan adat, Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.

[3] Sumardjono, Maria S.W. (2001), Kebijakan pertanahaan antara regulasi dan implementasi, Jakarta: Kompas.

Jurnal dan Lain-Lain

[4] Abdurrahman. (2015), Draft laporan pengkajian hukum tentang mekanisme pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat, Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sistem Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementrian Hukum Dan HAM RI. Jakarta.

[1] Aziz, Djamal. (2018), Tanah untuk kemakmuran rakyat, reforma agraria sebuah keniscayaan, Jurnal Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 009, Juni.

[2] Budimanta, Arif. (2018), Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial Melalui Reforma Agraria, Jurnal Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 009 Juni.

[3] Luthfi, Ahmad Nashih. (2013), Legalisasi Asset Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Akses Masyarakat Sekitar, Jurnal Bhumi, Vol. 03, No. 01.

[4] Rachbini, Didik J. dan Mattalata, Andi. (2018), Pertanahan Dalam Perspektif Teori Dan Konstitusi, Jurnal Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 009 Juni.

[5] Rachman, Noer Fauzi. (2014), Masyarakat Hukum Adat Adalah Penyandang Hak, Subek Hukum, Dan Pemilik Wilayah Adatnya, Wacana Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, Vol.14, No.33.

[6] Rongiyati, Sulasi. (2018), Reforma Agraria Melalui Perpres Nomor 86 Tahun 2018, Info Singkat, Vol X, No.19.

[7] Salam, Safrin. (2016), Kepastian Hukum Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Komunal Sebagai Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria, Jurnal Cita Hukum, Vol.4, No.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i2.3192

[8] Siahaan, Maruarar. (2018), Pengakuan dan perlindungan hak ulayat: aspek penting pembangunan Indonesia menuju sebesar-besar kemakmuran rakyat, Jurnal Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 009, Juni 2018.

[9] Sibuea, Harris Y.P. (2019), Urgensi Pembentukkan Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Info Singkat, Vol. XI, No. 04.

[10] Wicaksono, Aditya. & Yudha Purbawa 2018, Hutang Negara Dalam Reforma Agraria Studi Implementasi Mandat 9 Juta Hektar Tanah Indonesia, Jurnal Bhumi, Vol. 04 No.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.214

[11] Zakaria, Yando. (2016), Strategi Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Masyarakat (Hukum) Adat: Sebuah Pendekatan Sosio-Antropologis, Jurnal Bhumi, Vol.2 No.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v2i2.66

[12] Zakie, Mukmin. (2016), Konflik Agraria Yang Tak Pernah Reda, Jurnal Legality, Vol.24, No.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v24i1.4256

[13] Devita, Irma. (2018), Reforma agraria, Info Kenotariatan,web diposting pada 4 desember 2018 dilihat pada tanggal 4 april 2019, https://www.google.co.id/amp/s/irmadevita.com/amp/2018/reforma-agraria.

[14] Konsorsium Pembaharuan Agraria 2017, Reforma agraria di bawah bayangan investasi, Catatan Akhir Tahun 2017.

Published

2020-05-19

How to Cite

Status Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Adat Marga dalam Kebijakan Penataan Aset Reforma Agraria Di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara. (2020). SASI, 26(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.246

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2