Negotiated Legal Pluralism: Institutional Formalization and the Resilience of Tolaki Customary Dispute Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3523Keywords:
Transformation, Indigenous Dispute Resolution, Tolaki Customary Law, Legal Pluralism.Abstract
Introduction: The Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanism (CDRM) of the Tolaki people in Southeast Sulawesi faces faces structural pressures arising from state legal expansion, jurisdictional overlap with formal courts, and the gradual reconfiguration of customary authority within Indonesia’s plural legal order. Historically, the Tolaki customary law system has played a central role in maintaining social harmony and resolving internal conflicts. However, the penetration of national law, globalization, and rapid socio-economic structural changes have placed Tolaki CDRM at a crossroads of adaptation.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the transformation patterns of Tolaki CDRM and to measure its resilience as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism amid the dominance of the national legal system.
Methods of the Research: This qualitative research employs a socio-legal approach, combining normative analysis of Tolaki customary norms with empirical data from in-depth interviews with customary leaders (Pu'utobu, Mosoro), disputing parties, and judicial apparatus. Data was collected through document studies and field research in several Tolaki regions in Southeast Sulawesi.
Results of the Research: (1) Tolaki CDRM has undergone significant institutional transformation through formalization under local regulations, (2) Procedural adaptations include standardized mediation and documentation systems such as structured mediation stages, written settlement documentation, and administrative reporting mechanisms; (3) CDRM demonstrates high resilience, sustained by the philosophical foundation of Kalo Sara and dual legitimacy—traditional community-based legitimacy and administrative state recognition. CDRM operates in active co-existence with the national legal system, often functioning as a pre-litigation mechanism. The restorative justice approach of CDRM, emphasizing social relationship recovery (Loleka), proves more effective than retributive formal justice in maintaining long-term kinship harmony.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Abbas, A, A R Nur, H Djidar, and S Mannuhung. “Efektivitas Peraturan Daerah Masyarakat Adat Terhadap Eksistensi Lembaga Adat Wotu Dikabupaten Luwu Timur.” Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge 4, no. 9 (2025): 6489–6502.
Adenisatrawan, A. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Suku Tolaki Dalam Konteks Modernisasi.” Jurnal Esensi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2023): 22–29.
Agus, Agus, Sudirman Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar, and Ahmad Rustan. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration: The Potential and Challenges.” Sasi 29, no. 3 (2023): 570. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1393.
Alifuddin, Muhammad. “Dynamics Of Interfaith Communication In Segregated Communities.” HARMONI 23, no. 1 (2024): 18–34.
Amane, A P O. Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa. Jakarta: Penerbit Hukum, 2023.
Aprita, S, and O Purwasi. “The Role of Local Wisdom in Dispute Resolution: Integration of Traditional Values with Modern Legal Processes.” Indonesian Journal of Arbitration 1, no. 2 (2025): 102–108.
Bimantara, A. “Politik Hukum Pertanahan Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cahaya Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–10.
Danil, M, and R Raemon. “Peran Lembaga Adat Tolaki (LAT) Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Pelestarian Nilai-Nilai Budaya Suku Tolaki.” KABANTI: Jurnal Kerabat Antropologi 7, no. 2 (2023): 275–289.
Fadly, A M. “Efektifitas Hukum Adat Kalosara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Penganiayaan Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Pada Masyarakat Suku Tolaki Sulawesi Tenggara.” Jurnal Hukum Adat Indonesia 3, no. 2 (2024): 45–62.
Hakim, G. “Prinsip Hukum Adat Kalosara Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Suku Tolaki Sebagai Dasar Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Universitas Airlangga, 2015.
Hasudungan Sinaga, S H. Membedah Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Mega Press Nusantara, 2024.
Lilik Mulyadi, S H. Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni, 2022.
Maulana, I, F Yulianingsih, L Fitria, and D F B Syahizidane. “Sistem Perkawinan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga Dalam Hukum Adat Tolaki Di Sulawesi Tenggara.” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa 1, no. 12 (2025): 2138–2149.
Nurjaman, A, F H S Damanik, R Mirsel, L Y Camerling, L Wahjudin, and A M Nur. Konflik Sosial Dan Resolusi Konflik: Kajian Sosiologi Perspektif Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Dan Hukum. Jakarta: Star Digital Publishing, 2025.
Peribadi, Ambo Wonua Nusantara, Anzil, and La Janu. Konstruksi Perencanaan Participatory Berbasis Budaya Kalosara Sebuah Perspektif Sosiologi Pembangunan. Sleman: Deepublish, 2019.
Permatasari, E P, N F A Fabrianti, Q Salsabila, and M Z R Abada. “Pentingnya Penyelesaian Konflik Tanah Melalui Pembagian Warisan Yang Adil.” Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education 2, no. 2 (2023): 124–134.
Po’Oe, A L Q, and M T Tunggati. “Integrasi Hukum Adat Dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Publik Di Indonesia: Perspektif Keberlanjutan Sosial Dan Budaya (Studi Kasus Gorontalo.” Jurnal Administrasi, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Ilmu Sosial (JAEIS) 2, no. 3 (2023): 153–160.
Rahmawati, S. “Islam Dan Adat: Tradisi Kalosara Dalam Penyelesaian Hukum Keluarga Pada Masyarakat Tolaki Di Konawe Selatan.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2017.
Rezani, M, F Salim, and F Fijaini. “Pergeseran Legitimasi Balian Dalam Local Indigenous Governance Di Desa Hinas Kanan.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Pembangunan 2, no. 1 (2021): 21–35.
Saputra, A A, D Arifin, and B Basoddin. “Analisa Hukum Terhadap Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan Melalui Hukum Adat Tolaki (Suatu Studi Di Kecamatan Tinanggea Kabupaten Konawe Selatan).” Sultra Law Review 04, no. 01 (2020): 969–986.
Setiawan, A, A Alim, and R S Suraya. “Pola Pewarisan Kepemimpinan Puutobu Pada Masyarakat Tolaki Di Desa Tiraosu Kecamatan Kolono Kabupaten Konawe Selatan.” LISANI: Jurnal Kelisanan, Sastra, Dan Budaya 4, no. 2 (2021): 115–120.
Subair, Muh. “Internalizing Kalosara’s Value In A Traditional Dance ‘Lulo’ In The City of Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi.” Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion 02, no. 02 (2017): 198–213.
Sulaiman, S, M Muksalmina, E G PG, F Mardhatillah, T Tasyukur, A P Azzahra, and R Rahmadana. “Pendampingan Perangkat Adat Gampong Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Adat Di Gampong Paya Gaboh.” Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara 5, no. 4 (2024): 5121–5129.
Syafi’i, I. “Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia: Catatan Reflektif Konflik Perkebunan Sawit Di Kotawaringin Timur.” Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya 18, no. 3 (2016): 415–432.
Syarifuddin, La. “Sistem Hukum Adat Terhadap Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.” Risalah Hukum 15, no. 02 (2019): 1–10.
Tahali, A, M S Alhabsyi, R A R Massi, and A A Almahdali. “Efektivitas Sanksi Hukum Adat Di Desa Binangga Kecamatan Marawola Kabupaten Sigi.” Comparativa: Jurnal Ilmiah Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–26.
Tarigan, Alberto Paskah, Hisar Siregar, and Roida Nababan. “As a Consequences of the Law of Unilaterally Closing Road Access for Public Road Interests (Case Study of Register Number 92 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PN. Sim).” JLPH: Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 3 (2025): 2102–12.
Teguh, A H P, C MH, C MK, and M SH. “Peradilan Agraria Di Persimpangan: Antara Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial. Pohon Cahaya.” Jakarta: Cahya Atma Pustaka, 2025.
You, Y. Transformasi Budaya Masyarakat Tradisional Dan Konteks Wilayah Masyarakat Hubula Suku Dani: Model Laki-Laki Baru Masyarakat Hubula Suku Dani. Jakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ma'ruf Akib, Wahyudi Umar, Patta Hindi Asis, Wa Ode Amatyi Rachima Lalangi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
