Negotiated Legal Pluralism: Institutional Formalization and the Resilience of Tolaki Customary Dispute Resolution
), Wahyudi Umar(2), Patta Hindi Asis(3), Wa Ode Amatyi Rachima Lalangi(4)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
(4) Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanism (CDRM) of the Tolaki people in Southeast Sulawesi faces faces structural pressures arising from state legal expansion, jurisdictional overlap with formal courts, and the gradual reconfiguration of customary authority within Indonesia’s plural legal order. Historically, the Tolaki customary law system has played a central role in maintaining social harmony and resolving internal conflicts. However, the penetration of national law, globalization, and rapid socio-economic structural changes have placed Tolaki CDRM at a crossroads of adaptation.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the transformation patterns of Tolaki CDRM and to measure its resilience as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism amid the dominance of the national legal system.
Methods of the Research: This qualitative research employs a socio-legal approach, combining normative analysis of Tolaki customary norms with empirical data from in-depth interviews with customary leaders (Pu'utobu, Mosoro), disputing parties, and judicial apparatus. Data was collected through document studies and field research in several Tolaki regions in Southeast Sulawesi.
Results of the Research: (1) Tolaki CDRM has undergone significant institutional transformation through formalization under local regulations, (2) Procedural adaptations include standardized mediation and documentation systems such as structured mediation stages, written settlement documentation, and administrative reporting mechanisms; (3) CDRM demonstrates high resilience, sustained by the philosophical foundation of Kalo Sara and dual legitimacy—traditional community-based legitimacy and administrative state recognition. CDRM operates in active co-existence with the national legal system, often functioning as a pre-litigation mechanism. The restorative justice approach of CDRM, emphasizing social relationship recovery (Loleka), proves more effective than retributive formal justice in maintaining long-term kinship harmony.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3523
Published
2026-03-07
How To Cite
@article{SASI3523,
author = {Ma'ruf Akib and Wahyudi Umar and Patta Asis and Wa Ode Lalangi},
title = {Negotiated Legal Pluralism: Institutional Formalization and the Resilience of Tolaki Customary Dispute Resolution},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {32},
number = {1},
year = {2026},
keywords = {Transformation; Indigenous Dispute Resolution; Tolaki Customary Law; Legal Pluralism.},
abstract = {Introduction: The Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanism (CDRM) of the Tolaki people in Southeast Sulawesi faces faces structural pressures arising from state legal expansion, jurisdictional overlap with formal courts, and the gradual reconfiguration of customary authority within Indonesia’s plural legal order. Historically, the Tolaki customary law system has played a central role in maintaining social harmony and resolving internal conflicts. However, the penetration of national law, globalization, and rapid socio-economic structural changes have placed Tolaki CDRM at a crossroads of adaptation.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the transformation patterns of Tolaki CDRM and to measure its resilience as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism amid the dominance of the national legal system.Methods of the Research: This qualitative research employs a socio-legal approach, combining normative analysis of Tolaki customary norms with empirical data from in-depth interviews with customary leaders (Pu'utobu, Mosoro), disputing parties, and judicial apparatus. Data was collected through document studies and field research in several Tolaki regions in Southeast Sulawesi.Results of the Research: (1) Tolaki CDRM has undergone significant institutional transformation through formalization under local regulations, (2) Procedural adaptations include standardized mediation and documentation systems such as structured mediation stages, written settlement documentation, and administrative reporting mechanisms; (3) CDRM demonstrates high resilience, sustained by the philosophical foundation of Kalo Sara and dual legitimacy—traditional community-based legitimacy and administrative state recognition. CDRM operates in active co-existence with the national legal system, often functioning as a pre-litigation mechanism. The restorative justice approach of CDRM, emphasizing social relationship recovery (Loleka), proves more effective than retributive formal justice in maintaining long-term kinship harmony.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {30--39} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3523},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3523}
}
Abbas, A, A R Nur, H Djidar, and S Mannuhung. “Efektivitas Peraturan Daerah Masyarakat Adat Terhadap Eksistensi Lembaga Adat Wotu Dikabupaten Luwu Timur.” Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge 4, no. 9 (2025): 6489–6502.
Adenisatrawan, A. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Suku Tolaki Dalam Konteks Modernisasi.” Jurnal Esensi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2023): 22–29.
Agus, Agus, Sudirman Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar, and Ahmad Rustan. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration: The Potential and Challenges.” Sasi 29, no. 3 (2023): 570. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1393.
Alifuddin, Muhammad. “Dynamics Of Interfaith Communication In Segregated Communities.” HARMONI 23, no. 1 (2024): 18–34.
Amane, A P O. Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa. Jakarta: Penerbit Hukum, 2023.
Aprita, S, and O Purwasi. “The Role of Local Wisdom in Dispute Resolution: Integration of Traditional Values with Modern Legal Processes.” Indonesian Journal of Arbitration 1, no. 2 (2025): 102–108.
Bimantara, A. “Politik Hukum Pertanahan Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cahaya Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–10.
Danil, M, and R Raemon. “Peran Lembaga Adat Tolaki (LAT) Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Pelestarian Nilai-Nilai Budaya Suku Tolaki.” KABANTI: Jurnal Kerabat Antropologi 7, no. 2 (2023): 275–289.
Fadly, A M. “Efektifitas Hukum Adat Kalosara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Penganiayaan Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Pada Masyarakat Suku Tolaki Sulawesi Tenggara.” Jurnal Hukum Adat Indonesia 3, no. 2 (2024): 45–62.
Hakim, G. “Prinsip Hukum Adat Kalosara Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Suku Tolaki Sebagai Dasar Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Universitas Airlangga, 2015.
Hasudungan Sinaga, S H. Membedah Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Mega Press Nusantara, 2024.
Lilik Mulyadi, S H. Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni, 2022.
Maulana, I, F Yulianingsih, L Fitria, and D F B Syahizidane. “Sistem Perkawinan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga Dalam Hukum Adat Tolaki Di Sulawesi Tenggara.” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa 1, no. 12 (2025): 2138–2149.
Nurjaman, A, F H S Damanik, R Mirsel, L Y Camerling, L Wahjudin, and A M Nur. Konflik Sosial Dan Resolusi Konflik: Kajian Sosiologi Perspektif Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Dan Hukum. Jakarta: Star Digital Publishing, 2025.
Peribadi, Ambo Wonua Nusantara, Anzil, and La Janu. Konstruksi Perencanaan Participatory Berbasis Budaya Kalosara Sebuah Perspektif Sosiologi Pembangunan. Sleman: Deepublish, 2019.
Permatasari, E P, N F A Fabrianti, Q Salsabila, and M Z R Abada. “Pentingnya Penyelesaian Konflik Tanah Melalui Pembagian Warisan Yang Adil.” Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education 2, no. 2 (2023): 124–134.
Po’Oe, A L Q, and M T Tunggati. “Integrasi Hukum Adat Dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Publik Di Indonesia: Perspektif Keberlanjutan Sosial Dan Budaya (Studi Kasus Gorontalo.” Jurnal Administrasi, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Ilmu Sosial (JAEIS) 2, no. 3 (2023): 153–160.
Rahmawati, S. “Islam Dan Adat: Tradisi Kalosara Dalam Penyelesaian Hukum Keluarga Pada Masyarakat Tolaki Di Konawe Selatan.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2017.
Rezani, M, F Salim, and F Fijaini. “Pergeseran Legitimasi Balian Dalam Local Indigenous Governance Di Desa Hinas Kanan.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Pembangunan 2, no. 1 (2021): 21–35.
Saputra, A A, D Arifin, and B Basoddin. “Analisa Hukum Terhadap Penyelesaian Perkara Penganiayaan Melalui Hukum Adat Tolaki (Suatu Studi Di Kecamatan Tinanggea Kabupaten Konawe Selatan).” Sultra Law Review 04, no. 01 (2020): 969–986.
Setiawan, A, A Alim, and R S Suraya. “Pola Pewarisan Kepemimpinan Puutobu Pada Masyarakat Tolaki Di Desa Tiraosu Kecamatan Kolono Kabupaten Konawe Selatan.” LISANI: Jurnal Kelisanan, Sastra, Dan Budaya 4, no. 2 (2021): 115–120.
Subair, Muh. “Internalizing Kalosara’s Value In A Traditional Dance ‘Lulo’ In The City of Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi.” Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion 02, no. 02 (2017): 198–213.
Sulaiman, S, M Muksalmina, E G PG, F Mardhatillah, T Tasyukur, A P Azzahra, and R Rahmadana. “Pendampingan Perangkat Adat Gampong Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Adat Di Gampong Paya Gaboh.” Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara 5, no. 4 (2024): 5121–5129.
Syafi’i, I. “Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia: Catatan Reflektif Konflik Perkebunan Sawit Di Kotawaringin Timur.” Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya 18, no. 3 (2016): 415–432.
Syarifuddin, La. “Sistem Hukum Adat Terhadap Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.” Risalah Hukum 15, no. 02 (2019): 1–10.
Tahali, A, M S Alhabsyi, R A R Massi, and A A Almahdali. “Efektivitas Sanksi Hukum Adat Di Desa Binangga Kecamatan Marawola Kabupaten Sigi.” Comparativa: Jurnal Ilmiah Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–26.
Tarigan, Alberto Paskah, Hisar Siregar, and Roida Nababan. “As a Consequences of the Law of Unilaterally Closing Road Access for Public Road Interests (Case Study of Register Number 92 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PN. Sim).” JLPH: Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 3 (2025): 2102–12.
Teguh, A H P, C MH, C MK, and M SH. “Peradilan Agraria Di Persimpangan: Antara Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial. Pohon Cahaya.” Jakarta: Cahya Atma Pustaka, 2025.
You, Y. Transformasi Budaya Masyarakat Tradisional Dan Konteks Wilayah Masyarakat Hubula Suku Dani: Model Laki-Laki Baru Masyarakat Hubula Suku Dani. Jakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.
: 14 times
Download : 1 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Negotiated Legal Pluralism: Institutional Formalization and the Resilience of Tolaki Customary Dispute Resolution |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Ma'ruf Akib; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Wahyudi Umar; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Patta Hindi Asis; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor; Malaysia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Wa Ode Amatyi Rachima Lalangi; Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Transformation; Indigenous Dispute Resolution; Tolaki Customary Law; Legal Pluralism. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanism (CDRM) of the Tolaki people in Southeast Sulawesi faces faces structural pressures arising from state legal expansion, jurisdictional overlap with formal courts, and the gradual reconfiguration of customary authority within Indonesia’s plural legal order. Historically, the Tolaki customary law system has played a central role in maintaining social harmony and resolving internal conflicts. However, the penetration of national law, globalization, and rapid socio-economic structural changes have placed Tolaki CDRM at a crossroads of adaptation.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the transformation patterns of Tolaki CDRM and to measure its resilience as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism amid the dominance of the national legal system.Methods of the Research: This qualitative research employs a socio-legal approach, combining normative analysis of Tolaki customary norms with empirical data from in-depth interviews with customary leaders (Pu'utobu, Mosoro), disputing parties, and judicial apparatus. Data was collected through document studies and field research in several Tolaki regions in Southeast Sulawesi.Results of the Research: (1) Tolaki CDRM has undergone significant institutional transformation through formalization under local regulations, (2) Procedural adaptations include standardized mediation and documentation systems such as structured mediation stages, written settlement documentation, and administrative reporting mechanisms; (3) CDRM demonstrates high resilience, sustained by the philosophical foundation of Kalo Sara and dual legitimacy—traditional community-based legitimacy and administrative state recognition. CDRM operates in active co-existence with the national legal system, often functioning as a pre-litigation mechanism. The restorative justice approach of CDRM, emphasizing social relationship recovery (Loleka), proves more effective than retributive formal justice in maintaining long-term kinship harmony. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2026-03-07 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3523 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3523 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 32 Issue 1, March 2026 (In Progress Issue) |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Ma'ruf Akib, Wahyudi Umar, Patta Hindi Asis, Wa Ode Amatyi Rachima Lalangi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
