Penyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam Oleh Masyarakat Adat

Authors

  • Ratu Boi Maira Suat Pasai Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Reimon Supusepa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Iqbal Taufik Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1113

Keywords:

Abuse, Sharp Weapons, Indigenous Peoples

Abstract

Introduction: Prohibited acts other than firearms and explosives include those that are not firearms because it is prohibited to carry bats, stabbing and stabbing tools.

Purposes of the Research: To describe the abuse and the factors that hinder the legal handling of sharp weapons by indigenous peoples.

Methods of the Research: This research method is a type of empirical juridical research, or called field research, examining applicable legal provisions, and its actual actions that occur in society itself. 

Results of the Research: Misuse of sharp weapons by Indigenous Peoples in Waesama Subdistrict, South Buru Regency and the occurrence of murder cases due to carrying sharp vessels in the form of machetes in the general environment of the community, saying that "carrying sharp weapons has become their habit for generations, which is always carried wherever they travel both in the forest and the general environment of the community and part of their activity. The factors hindering the legal handling of sharp weapons abuse in Waesama District, South Buru Regency, are caused by internal and external factors. Internal factors are the existence of a habit that is cultivated, the curator of awareness and knowledge of indigenous peoples is lacking. Meanwhile, extenal factors are religious and educational factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Abdul kadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Agus Nur Arsad. “Faktor Kriminogen Penyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam di Muka Umum” Journal Justiciabelen 2, no.1 (2022): 48-69.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Dengan

Pidana Penjara, Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP, 1996.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Abadi, 2002.

J. Ardian. Tindak Pidana Penggunaan Senjata Tajam dalam Undang-undang Darurat No. 12 Tahun 1951 Tentang Mengubah “Ordonnatie Tijdelijke Bijzondere Strafbeplingen” (SBTL. 1984 No. 17). Tesis. Surabaya, 2020.

Leonardus Agung Putra Utama., Febby Mutiara Nelson. “Tindak Pidana Senjata Api dan Senjata Tajam dalam Undang-Undang Darurat No. 12 Tahun 1951 Dikaitakn dengan Faktor Korelatif Kriminalisasi”. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i 9, no.2 (2022): 549-562.

Putri Mia Sarah, Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam yang Mengakibatkan Mati atau Luka Beratnya Orang Lain, Artikel, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 2014.

Rakyu Swanabumi Rahmantara Rosady. “Tindak Pidana dan Petanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Peyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam”. Jurist Diction 3, no. 5 (2020): 1863-1882.

Reimon Supusepa. "Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penaggulangan Kejahatan Pedofilia (Studi Komparasi Di Berbagai Negara Asing)." SASI 17, no. 2 (2011): 39-52.

Salmiwati Rumadan., Remon Supusepa, and Steven Makaruku. "Kajian Kriminologis Tentang Perkelahian Antar Anak (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Wearinama, Kabupaten Seram Bagian Timur)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2021): 319 – 336.

Umar Said Sugiarto, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014

Warti Lasmaria, Analisis Putusan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Menguasai dan Membawa Senjata Penikam atau Senjata Penusuk (Studi Putusan Nomor 538/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Mdn). Medan, 2019

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31

How to Cite

Penyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam Oleh Masyarakat Adat. (2022). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(5), 500 – 508. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1113

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2