Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Transaksi Jual Beli Online Dengan Menggunakan Fitur Paylater
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i8.1421Keywords:
Online Transactions, Shopee Paylater, DefaultAbstract
Introduction: Shopee Paylater is a payment method which means users or consumers will get loans instantly. Each agreement of the parties has an obligation to fulfill achievements to other parties, in practice some of the Consumers do not carry out their obligations properly and correctly, some of the Consumers are not in good faith when carrying out product or service transactions, there are also buyers who do not pay in accordance with the agreed maturity date, therefore the Consumer is deemed to have defaulted.
Purposes of the Research: Analyze and review the dispute resolution process if the consumer defaults on the Shopee Paylate payment method.
Methods of the Research: : This research is included in normative legal research, namely research examining various positive legal provisions, various legal principles, legal principles and doctrines to answer legal issues faced by.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the The procedure for carrying out online buying and selling transactions through Shopee using the Paylater feature can be done with the payment method in cash or installments. Furthermore, the process of resolving consumer disputes who default on paylater on the shopee marketplace is by paying a fine of 5% of the total bill and will continue to increase if it is not paid, consumers cannot checkout through shopee and the existing shopee paylater limit will be reduced because of this. the. does not carry out dispute resolution methods through litigation or non-litigation, the Shopee Paylater organizer only takes steps to resolve the dispute internally and provides administrative sanctions for defaulters on the Shopee Paylater usage agreement.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Ali Achmad Chomzah., (2003), Seri Hukum Pertanahan III Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah dan Seri Hukum Pertanahan IV Pengadaan Tanah Instansi Pemerintah, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta. Burhanuddin S., (2009), Hukum Kontrak Syariah, BPFE, Yogyakarta. Tjoanda, M., Hetharie, Y., Pariela, M. V. G., & Sopamena, R. F. (2021). Covid-19 sebagai Bentuk Overmacht dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit. SASI, 27(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447 Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007, https://doi.org/340.072. Salim H.S., (2008), Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Takdir Rahmadi., (2017), Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Yahya Harahap., (1986), Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan Kedua, Alumni, Bandung.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hijriyanti Hijriyanti, Teng Berlianty, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
