Causation in Medical Malpractice: Evaluating Conditio Sine Qua Non, Adequate Causation, and Objective Imputation in Indonesian Court Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i12.3730Keywords:
Causation, Medical Malpractice, Conditio Sine Qua Non, Criminal Liability.Abstract
Introduction: This study examines the application of causation theories in medical malpractice cases, focusing on the complex intersection between medical uncertainty and legal certainty. Within the inherently multi-causal nature of clinical practice, establishing a definitive causal link between a physician's omission and a patient's death remains a significant judicial challenge in Indonesia.
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to evaluate the consistency of judicial reasoning in applying causation theories through an in-depth analysis of the District Court of Denpasar Decision No. 126/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Dps. Furthermore, it seeks to identify whether the court's approach aligns with modern normative attribution standards in criminal law.
Methods of the Research: Employing a normative legal research method with statute, case, and conceptual approaches, the study compares conditio sine qua non, adequate causation, and objective imputation.
Findings of the Research: Findings reveal a “methodological shift” in judicial reasoning, moving from rigid factual analysis towards elements of adequate causation and objective imputation. However, a critical flaw identified is the court's failure to distinguish between “inherent medical risks” and “negligent risks”. The novelty lies in exposing the inconsistent application of these theories, leading to legal unpredictability. The study concludes that Indonesian courts require a more robust normative framework, particularly the integration of objective imputation, to ensure criminal liability in medical malpractice is assessed based on professional standards, not just fatal outcomes.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Buri, Maximilian von. Die Kausalität Und Ihre Strafrechtliche Bedeutung. Stuttgart: Enke, 1873.
Fletcher, George P. Rethinking Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Hart, H. L. A., and Tony Honoré. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Hasbullah. Standar Keselamatan Pasien Dan Profesionalitas Tenaga Medis. Jakarta: Penerbit Hukum, 2020.
Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto & Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2019.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Ketujuh Be. Jakarta: Kencana, 2023.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2003.
Roxin, Claus. Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil: Band I. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2006.
Septarina, Masha. Kausalitas Dan Standar Profesi Dalam Malpraktik Medis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2021.
Simons, Johannes. Leerboek van Het Nederlandsche Strafrecht. Groningen: P. Noordhoff, 1973.
Siregar, Rospita Adelina. Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Peraturan Perundang Undangan Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafiti Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 James Wilson Muabuay, Mompang Lycurgus Panggabean, Rospita Adelina Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
