Legal Protection for Victims of Cyber-Fraud

Glorianus Wau; Mompang Lycurgus Panggabean

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v6i4.3875

Authors

Glorianus Wau Universitas Kristen Indonesia , Indonesia
Mompang Lycurgus Panggabean Universitas Kristen Indonesia , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v6i4.3875

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Criminal Offense, Online Fraud

Abstract

Introduction: Online fraud cases are increasingly prevalent and represent a significant societal challenge. The diversity of these fraudulent activities indicates a lack of public vigilance and a high level of trust in information circulating on social media. This issue necessitates a robust legal framework to effectively safeguard victims within the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Purposes of the Research: he purpose of this study is to examine the legal protection mechanisms for victims of online fraud. It evaluates the limitations of the current legal system, which often prioritizes punishing perpetrators without an adequate focus on victim rehabilitation or the recovery of material losses caused by the various fraudulent activities in Indonesia.

Methods of the Research: This research utilizes a normative legal research method, commonly referred to as doctrinal research, focusing on the analysis of online fraud cases. This approach is chosen because current criminal enforcement often lacks optimization in addressing victim needs, emphasizing punitive sanctions rather than comprehensive restitution for the actual harm and trauma suffered.

Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that legal protection for victims is categorized into preventive and repressive measures. Repressive protection is essential, particularly through restitution to compensate for material losses. This study also confirms that current countermeasures align with Article 28 and Article 45A of Law Number 1 of 2024 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya Yudi, “Sebar Ribuan SMS Palsu dari BCA dan UOB, 2 WN China Dipenjara 5 Tahun,”, https://dandapala.com/article/detail/sebar-ribuan-sms-palsu-dari-bca-dan-uob-2-wn-china-dipenjara-5-tahun/.

Andi Sofyan and Abdul Azis, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Anisa Sahara and Kuswandi, “Penipuan Online sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Siber dalam Perspektif Kriminologi,” Parlementer 2, no. 4 (2025): 91-105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.62383/parlementer.v2i4.1425.

Agus Rusmana, "Penipuan Dalam Interaksi Melalui Media Sosial (Kasus Peristiwa Penipuan Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Masyarakat Berjejaring)." Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan 3, no. 2 (2015): 187-194. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v3i2.9994.

Aziz Suharto, “Upaya Perlindungan terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Online,” Iblam Law Review 4, no. 3 (2024): 23-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i3.449.

Ihsan M. and Burhayan, Hambatan dalam Menangani Tindak Pidana Penipuan melalui Media Sosial, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2022.

Lilik Mulyadi, Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya, Bandung: Alumni, 2007.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Surabaya: Peradaban, 2007.

Ruslan Renggong, Hukum Pidana Khusus, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.

Yusran Radyamal Al Miski, Satria Manggala Putra, Muhammad Iqbal Purwanto, Syadza Luthfiyyah., “Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Penipuan (Bedrog) dalam Pasal 378 KUHP di Era Digital,” Journal Equitable 10, no. 2 (2025): 369-389. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v10i2.9072.