The Effectiveness of the Absentee Ownership Ban in Supporting National Food Security
), Mahdi Muhammad(2)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Banyumas, Indonesia
(2) Regional Office of the Ministry of Law, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Agricultural land constitutes a strategic foundation for national food security and food sovereignty. However, absentee ownership—where land is held by individuals who neither reside near nor actively cultivate it—continues to weaken agricultural productivity and distort land governance. Although the Basic Agrarian Law formally prohibits such practices, structural and normative deficiencies hinder effective enforcement.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of absentee ownership prohibition regulations and formulate policy recommendations to improve their implementation in order to support food security.
Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical (doctrinal) method focusing on positive legal norms governing absentee land ownership. It utilizes statutory, conceptual, and public policy approaches to assess regulatory coherence, enforcement limitations, and the need for reform, particularly in strengthening agrarian governance and its integration with national food policy frameworks.
Findings of the Research: The findings demonstrate that the existing regulatory regime remains weak in supervision, operational definitions of active management, progressive sanctioning mechanisms, and integration with sustainable agricultural land protection policies. This study advances agrarian scholarship by repositioning the expansion of the absentee prohibition as a strategic governance instrument directly linked to land productivity, sustainable utilization, and national food security enhancement. This research offers a new perspective by integrating the prohibition of absentee ownership into a comprehensive food security policy framework, which has not been widely explored in the literature.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v6i1.3780
Published
2026-03-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI3780,
author = {Soediro Soediro and Mahdi Muhammad},
title = {The Effectiveness of the Absentee Ownership Ban in Supporting National Food Security},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
year = {2026},
keywords = {Absentee Land Ownership; Agrarian Law; Food Security; Land Productivity; Land Policy.},
abstract = {Introduction: Agricultural land constitutes a strategic foundation for national food security and food sovereignty. However, absentee ownership—where land is held by individuals who neither reside near nor actively cultivate it—continues to weaken agricultural productivity and distort land governance. Although the Basic Agrarian Law formally prohibits such practices, structural and normative deficiencies hinder effective enforcement.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of absentee ownership prohibition regulations and formulate policy recommendations to improve their implementation in order to support food security.Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical (doctrinal) method focusing on positive legal norms governing absentee land ownership. It utilizes statutory, conceptual, and public policy approaches to assess regulatory coherence, enforcement limitations, and the need for reform, particularly in strengthening agrarian governance and its integration with national food policy frameworks.Findings of the Research: The findings demonstrate that the existing regulatory regime remains weak in supervision, operational definitions of active management, progressive sanctioning mechanisms, and integration with sustainable agricultural land protection policies. This study advances agrarian scholarship by repositioning the expansion of the absentee prohibition as a strategic governance instrument directly linked to land productivity, sustainable utilization, and national food security enhancement. This research offers a new perspective by integrating the prohibition of absentee ownership into a comprehensive food security policy framework, which has not been widely explored in the literature.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {36--49} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v6i1.3780},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/3780}
}
Agung, Anak, dan Ayu Intan. “Pendaftaran Tanah Secara Elektronik : Kajian atas Keamanan Data E-Sertipikat.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 10, no. 03 (2025): 526–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i03.p5.
BPHN. “Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 224 Tahun 1961,” 1961.
Chandra, D.M.P.A. “Penerapan Larangan Pemilikan Tanah Pertanian Secara Absentee.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2019): 143–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v3i2s.3364.
Dayanti, Widi Rahma; Soetjipto, Widyono. “Dampak Kebijakan Perlindungan Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan (LP2B) terhadap Sektor Pertanian.” SYNTAX IDEA 6, no. 04 (2024): 1771–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i4.3172.
Kalyana, Lily, dan Widodo Budidarmo. “Dynamics of Land Ownership Rights in the Perspective of Indonesian Agrarian Law in the Perspective of Legal Certainty and Social Justice.” Journal of Sharia 04, no. 02 (2025): 234–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v4i02.2021.
Louk Fanggi, Prandy Arthayoga; Tresna, Lalu Panca; Muhammad; Ade Sultan. “Pembaharuan Aturan Larangan Kepemilikan Tanah Pertanian Secara Absentee di Indonesia.” Jurnal Private Law Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram 5, no. 2 (2025): 407–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v5i2.7212.
Marwiyah; A’yun, Qurota; Putri, Nalista. “Pengaturan Hukum Tanah Absentee Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Agraria Di Indonesia.” AMAR 3, no. 1 (2025): 25–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62734/amar.v3i1.757.
Muryono, Slamet; Utami, Westi. “Pemetaan Potensi Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan Guna Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 6, no. 2 (2020): 201–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v6i2.431.
Nuryasinta, Radhityas Kharisma, dan Padhina Pangestika. “Legalitas Aset dan Manajemen Lahan Sebagai Penguatan Reforma Agraria : Studi Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani Gurem.” Tunas Agraria 8, no. 2 (2025): 236–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i2.421.
Putra, Brata Yudha; Rosmidah; Manik, Herlina. “Penertiban Kawasan dan Tanah Terlantar Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Hangoluan Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 175–203.
Putri, Aminah, dan Bambang Wibisono. “Implementasi Kebijakan Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Kebijakan Publik 13, no. 4 (2022): 323–30. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v13i4.8163.
Quraisy, Raflinov, Sigit Primasatya, Roro Muninggar, Ria Istianti, Hari Purwanto, Excha Safira, dan Rahmansyah Fikriadin. “Redistribusi Tanah Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Petani.” Pamulang Law Review 7 (14 November 2024): 271–85. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v7i2.44833.
Rangga Ditya Yofa; Sri Hery Susilowati; Sumedi. “Penguasaan Lahan dan Pola Tanam: Implikasinya Pada Produktivitas Lahan Pertanian.” Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 23, no. 1 (2025): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v23n1.2025.77-92.
Refaldi, Reza, dan Habib Adjie. “Implementasi Larangan Kepemilikan Tanah Secara Absentee.” Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 2 (2025): 335–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i2.6430.
Renald, Andi, Muhammad Riyan, dan Kachfi Boer. “Optimalisasi Pajak Progresif sebagai Instrumen Penertiban Tanah Terlantar: Studi Komparatif dan Rekonseptualisasi Kebijakan Pertanahan di Indonesia.” Widya Bhumi 5, no. 1 (2025): 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31292/wb.v5i1.236.
Risdianto, Arjena Nayunda, dan Felix Marshal Jotham. “Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan ‘ Food Estate ’ Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Keberlanjutan Lahan Pertanian Dan Ketahanan Pangan Di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah.” Jurnal Kajian Agraria dan Kedaulatan Pangan 3, no. 1 (2024): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.32734/jkakp.v3i1.14748.
Rosmiati, Nia; Amiludin. “Pelaksanaan Larangan Pemilikan Tanah Pertanian Secara Absentee di Kecamatan Mauk Kabupaten Tangerang (Studi Kasus di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Tangerang).” Jurnal Hukum Replik 7, no. 2 (2019): 18–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v7i2.2936.
Saifuddin, Rahmawan; Dawud, Joni; Abdullah, Sait; Afandi, Muhamad Nur. “Strategi kebijakan perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan (LP2B) di Kota Sukabumi.” Jurnal Media Administrasi 05, no. 1 (2024): 34–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31113/jmat.v5i1.96.
Sheva Reinaldy Lumenta; Ronald J. Mawuntu: Lambonan, Marthin L. “Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Larangan Kepemilikan Tanah Pertanian Absentee.” Lex Administratum 13, no. 4 (2025).
Sukamto, Iwan; Priyanto Yuwono. “Konsistensi Kaidah Hukum tentang Ketimpangan Distribusi Tanah dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan.” Litigasi 24, no. 1 (2023): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.6213.
Syaputra, Didi; Al-Amin, M.Bagus. “epemilikan tanah pertanian absentee dan pola penggarapannya di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir.” Al-Dalil 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58707/aldalil.v3i1.529.
Utomo, Dani Lukmito. “Tren Penelitian Penatagunaan Tanah dalam Kebijakan Pertanahan: Analisis Bibliometrik dari Perspektif Negara Berkembang.” Tunas Agraria 8, no. 3 SE-Artikel (2 September 2025): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i3.477.
Wulandari, Nawang Wahyu, Muhammad Rizqi, dan Mitha Merlyan. “Problematika Hukum Tanah Absentee serta Dampak Pengecualian bagi Aparatur Sipil Negara terhadap Ketimpangan Agraria.” Tunas Agraria 9, no. 4 (2026): 135–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v9i1.537.| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | The Effectiveness of the Absentee Ownership Ban in Supporting National Food Security |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Soediro Soediro; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Banyumas; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Mahdi Muhammad; Regional Office of the Ministry of Law, Semarang, Indonesia; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Absentee Land Ownership; Agrarian Law; Food Security; Land Productivity; Land Policy. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Agricultural land constitutes a strategic foundation for national food security and food sovereignty. However, absentee ownership—where land is held by individuals who neither reside near nor actively cultivate it—continues to weaken agricultural productivity and distort land governance. Although the Basic Agrarian Law formally prohibits such practices, structural and normative deficiencies hinder effective enforcement.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of absentee ownership prohibition regulations and formulate policy recommendations to improve their implementation in order to support food security.Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical (doctrinal) method focusing on positive legal norms governing absentee land ownership. It utilizes statutory, conceptual, and public policy approaches to assess regulatory coherence, enforcement limitations, and the need for reform, particularly in strengthening agrarian governance and its integration with national food policy frameworks.Findings of the Research: The findings demonstrate that the existing regulatory regime remains weak in supervision, operational definitions of active management, progressive sanctioning mechanisms, and integration with sustainable agricultural land protection policies. This study advances agrarian scholarship by repositioning the expansion of the absentee prohibition as a strategic governance instrument directly linked to land productivity, sustainable utilization, and national food security enhancement. This research offers a new perspective by integrating the prohibition of absentee ownership into a comprehensive food security policy framework, which has not been widely explored in the literature. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2026-03-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/3780 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v6i1.3780 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Volume 6 Issue 1, March 2026 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Soediro Soediro, Mahdi Muhammad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
: 9 times
Download : 4 times






