Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective
)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The inclusion of a third party's personal data as an emergency contact in an agreement is often done one-sidedly by the debtor, to the detriment of the third party who is often disturbed to find the debtor's whereabouts, even though the third party does’nt know and never agreed to have his personal data included as an emergency contact.
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to find out the abrogation of the principle of privity of contract in the context of one-sided withdrawal of a third party as an emergency contact in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht).
Methods of the Research: This research is using the normative juridical method. The approach is through legislation, which is the Civil Code and conceptual approaches.
Results of the Research: The principle of privity of contract in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht) will be invalid and cannot be applied to emergency contact if the third party whose name is included is not asked for prior approval by the parties in the agreement.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998
Published
2024-03-31
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV1998,
author = {Wijaya Panjaitan},
title = {Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective},
journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Privity of contract; Emergency Contact; Borgtocht.},
abstract = {Introduction: The inclusion of a third party's personal data as an emergency contact in an agreement is often done one-sidedly by the debtor, to the detriment of the third party who is often disturbed to find the debtor's whereabouts, even though the third party does’nt know and never agreed to have his personal data included as an emergency contact.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to find out the abrogation of the principle of privity of contract in the context of one-sided withdrawal of a third party as an emergency contact in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht).Methods of the Research: This research is using the normative juridical method. The approach is through legislation, which is the Civil Code and conceptual approaches.Results of the Research: The principle of privity of contract in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht) will be invalid and cannot be applied to emergency contact if the third party whose name is included is not asked for prior approval by the parties in the agreement.},
issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {54--61} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1998}
}
Journal Article
Angelin, Margareta Sevilla Rosa. “Hilangnya Esensi ‘Persetujuan’ Dalam Jaminan Perorangan Pada Praktik Pinjaman Online.” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2022): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.5882.
Mahadevi, Ni Putu Intan, and I Made Dedy Priyanto. “Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Orang Yang Identitasnya Digunakan Sebagai Emergency Contact Pinjol Secara Sepihak.” Kertha Negara 10, no. 5 (2022): 521–32. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/79328.
Mantili, Rai. “Actio Paulina Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Bagi Kreditor Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang (PKP).” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 2 (2020): 21–37. http://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/127/108.
Marzuki, Agus, and Arvie Johan. “Universalitas Asas Privity Of Contract.” Jurnal Tapis 10, no. 2 (2014): 106–24. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/view/1609.
Prasetyawati, Niken, and Tony Hanoraga. “Jaminan Kebendaan Dan Jaminan Perorangan Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Piutang.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH) 8, no. 1 (2015): 120–34. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v8i1.1247.
Shandy, Ricky, and Retno Dewi Pulung Sari. “Aspek Hukum Pencantuman Data Pribadi Secara Sepihak Sebagai Kontak Darurat Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Online.” Binamulia Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.452.
Shofiyah, Erni Nur, and Indri Fogar Susilowati. “Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Penerima Pinjaman Dalam Peer to Peer Lending.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 1–6. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/novum/article/view/30092.
Siahaan, Clara Fransiska Olivia, and Rica Gusmarani. “Penggunaan Jaminan Perorangan Dalam Praktik Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah.” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 2 (2023): 278–87. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/17048.
Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian.” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 107–20. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.318.
Sukmawati, Murlyta Nevi. “Personal Guarante Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan.” Airlangga Development Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 62–79. https://doi.org/10.20473/adj.v3i1.18153.
Yunianti, Nur Intan, and Ambar Budhisulistyawati. “Efektivitas Jaminan Perorangan (Personal Guarantee) Dalam Menunjang Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Di Bank BRI Cabang Surakarta Dan Bank BNI Syariah Cabang Surakarta.” Jurnal Privat Law 8, no. 1 (2020): 111–16. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40383.
Book
Black, Henry Campbell, and Bryan A Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary. New York: West Group, 2009.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.
Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Setiawan, I Ketut Oka. Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
: 301 times
Download : 231 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Abrogation “Privity of Contract” Due To One Sided Withdrawal of A Third Party As An Emergency Contact From Borgtocht Perspective |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Privity of contract; Emergency Contact; Borgtocht. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The inclusion of a third party's personal data as an emergency contact in an agreement is often done one-sidedly by the debtor, to the detriment of the third party who is often disturbed to find the debtor's whereabouts, even though the third party does’nt know and never agreed to have his personal data included as an emergency contact.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to find out the abrogation of the principle of privity of contract in the context of one-sided withdrawal of a third party as an emergency contact in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht).Methods of the Research: This research is using the normative juridical method. The approach is through legislation, which is the Civil Code and conceptual approaches.Results of the Research: The principle of privity of contract in the perspective of personal guarantee law (borgtocht) will be invalid and cannot be applied to emergency contact if the third party whose name is included is not asked for prior approval by the parties in the agreement. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-03-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/1998 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/ballrev.v5i1.1998 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 5, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, MARCH 2024 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2024 Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
