Ambiguity in Supreme Court Decisions on Ambon's Customary Land: The 1814 Dati Register and the Challenge of Evidentiary Systems
), Triska Demmatacco(3), Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun(4)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Ownership of recognized land in Ambon, particularly in the Dati (locally recognized land), is granted by the state to individuals who have rendered services to the state and possess strong legal rights that can be passed on to the rights holder's descendants. Generally, land in the Ambon region is customary land (tanah dati) subject to and controlled by the right of ownership (beschikkingsrecht) of the village or village concerned.
Purposes of the Research: To examine the factors that led to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia's decisions being enforced using outdated evidence and how to influence the reconstruction of ambiguity regarding the justice of Supreme Court decisions enforced based on the 1814 Dati Register, which contains a failed evidentiary system.
Methods of the Research: Sociolegal research, a combination of doctrinal and empirical legal research methods.
Results Main Findings of the Research: The weaknesses of Supreme Court decisions enforced using outdated evidence are: The 1814 Dati Register was not intended as proof of land ownership under modern law, but rather as an administrative tool for colonial tax purposes; The 1814 Dati Register Letter is old, incomplete and often does not correspond to the actual conditions of existing customary land, thus causing uncertainty and disputes; the existence of differences in interpretation of customary law and national law in courts causes the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia often do not reflect substantive justice for indigenous peoples; and this failure has implications for obstacles to customary land registration at the National Land Agency and the potential for prolonged conflict between indigenous peoples and other parties, and the abolition of the dati institution as outlined in the decision on June 1, 1923, contains the meaning of changes in the customary land ownership system in Ambon, especially the change from the concept of dati-doesoen (land dati) to poesaka-doesoen. make it in academic English.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/ballrev.v7i1.3469
Published
2026-03-31
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV3469,
author = {Ronald Saija and Marselo Pariela and Triska Demmatacco and Muchtar Labetubun},
title = {Ambiguity in Supreme Court Decisions on Ambon's Customary Land: The 1814 Dati Register and the Challenge of Evidentiary Systems},
journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
volume = {7},
number = {1},
year = {2026},
keywords = {Ambiguity Reconstruction; Data Register; Justice; Evidence System.},
abstract = {Introduction: Ownership of recognized land in Ambon, particularly in the Dati (locally recognized land), is granted by the state to individuals who have rendered services to the state and possess strong legal rights that can be passed on to the rights holder's descendants. Generally, land in the Ambon region is customary land (tanah dati) subject to and controlled by the right of ownership (beschikkingsrecht) of the village or village concerned.Purposes of the Research: To examine the factors that led to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia's decisions being enforced using outdated evidence and how to influence the reconstruction of ambiguity regarding the justice of Supreme Court decisions enforced based on the 1814 Dati Register, which contains a failed evidentiary system.Methods of the Research: Sociolegal research, a combination of doctrinal and empirical legal research methods.Results Main Findings of the Research: The weaknesses of Supreme Court decisions enforced using outdated evidence are: The 1814 Dati Register was not intended as proof of land ownership under modern law, but rather as an administrative tool for colonial tax purposes; The 1814 Dati Register Letter is old, incomplete and often does not correspond to the actual conditions of existing customary land, thus causing uncertainty and disputes; the existence of differences in interpretation of customary law and national law in courts causes the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia often do not reflect substantive justice for indigenous peoples; and this failure has implications for obstacles to customary land registration at the National Land Agency and the potential for prolonged conflict between indigenous peoples and other parties, and the abolition of the dati institution as outlined in the decision on June 1, 1923, contains the meaning of changes in the customary land ownership system in Ambon, especially the change from the concept of dati-doesoen (land dati) to poesaka-doesoen. make it in academic English.},
issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {11--23} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v7i1.3469},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/3469}
}
Effendi, Ziwar. Hukum Adat Ambon Lease. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1987.
Holleman, F. D. Het Adat-Grondenrecht van Ambon En de Oeliasers. Delft: W.D. Meinema, 1923.
Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. Tebaran Pemikiran Seputar Masalah Hukum Tanah. Jakarta: Lembaga Pemberdayaan Hukum Indonesia, 2005.
Kartasapoetra, G., R. G. Kartasapoetra, A. G. Kartasapoetra, and A. Setiady. Hukum Tanah:Jaminan UUPA Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Ruchiyat, Eddy. Politik Pertanahan: Sebelum Dan Sesudah Berlakunya UUPA (U.U. No. 5 Tahun 1960). Bandung: Alumni, 1995.
Salle, Aminuddin. Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.
Sulistyowati Irianto. Memperkenalkan Studi Sosiolegal Dan Implementasi Metodologisnya, Dalam Sulistyowaty Dan Sidharta (Eds), Metode Penelitian Hukum Konstelasi Dan Refleksi, Hlm 177. Lihat Juga Dalam Sulistyowati Irianto Dalam Buku Yang Sama, Praktik Hukum: Perspektif Sosiole. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor, 2009.
Titahelu, Ronald Z. Aneka Masalah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2014.
Valentijn’s, Francois. Oud En Nieuw Oost-Indien. Amsterdam: Gerard Onder de Linden, Dordrecht, 1862.
: 8 times
Download : 7 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Ambiguity in Supreme Court Decisions on Ambon's Customary Land: The 1814 Dati Register and the Challenge of Evidentiary Systems |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Ronald Saija; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Triska Demmatacco; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun; Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Ambiguity Reconstruction; Data Register; Justice; Evidence System. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Ownership of recognized land in Ambon, particularly in the Dati (locally recognized land), is granted by the state to individuals who have rendered services to the state and possess strong legal rights that can be passed on to the rights holder's descendants. Generally, land in the Ambon region is customary land (tanah dati) subject to and controlled by the right of ownership (beschikkingsrecht) of the village or village concerned.Purposes of the Research: To examine the factors that led to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia's decisions being enforced using outdated evidence and how to influence the reconstruction of ambiguity regarding the justice of Supreme Court decisions enforced based on the 1814 Dati Register, which contains a failed evidentiary system.Methods of the Research: Sociolegal research, a combination of doctrinal and empirical legal research methods.Results Main Findings of the Research: The weaknesses of Supreme Court decisions enforced using outdated evidence are: The 1814 Dati Register was not intended as proof of land ownership under modern law, but rather as an administrative tool for colonial tax purposes; The 1814 Dati Register Letter is old, incomplete and often does not correspond to the actual conditions of existing customary land, thus causing uncertainty and disputes; the existence of differences in interpretation of customary law and national law in courts causes the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia often do not reflect substantive justice for indigenous peoples; and this failure has implications for obstacles to customary land registration at the National Land Agency and the potential for prolonged conflict between indigenous peoples and other parties, and the abolition of the dati institution as outlined in the decision on June 1, 1923, contains the meaning of changes in the customary land ownership system in Ambon, especially the change from the concept of dati-doesoen (land dati) to poesaka-doesoen. make it in academic English. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2026-03-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/3469 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/ballrev.v7i1.3469 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 7, No 1 (2026): VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, MARCH 2026 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Ronald Saija, Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, Triska Demmatacco, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
