Ambiguity in Supreme Court Decisions on Ambon's Customary Land: The 1814 Dati Register and the Challenge of Evidentiary Systems

Authors

  • Ronald Saija Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Triska Demmatacco Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-7384 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v7i1.3469

Keywords:

Ambiguity Reconstruction, Data Register, Justice, Evidence System.

Abstract

Introduction: Ownership of recognized land in Ambon, particularly in the Dati (locally recognized land), is granted by the state to individuals who have rendered services to the state and possess strong legal rights that can be passed on to the rights holder's descendants. Generally, land in the Ambon region is customary land (tanah dati) subject to and controlled by the right of ownership (beschikkingsrecht) of the village or village concerned.

Purposes of the Research: To examine the factors that led to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia's decisions being enforced using outdated evidence and how to influence the reconstruction of ambiguity regarding the justice of Supreme Court decisions enforced based on the 1814 Dati Register, which contains a failed evidentiary system.

Methods of the Research: Sociolegal research, a combination of doctrinal and empirical legal research methods.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The weaknesses of Supreme Court decisions enforced using outdated evidence are: The 1814 Dati Register was not intended as proof of land ownership under modern law, but rather as an administrative tool for colonial tax purposes; The 1814 Dati Register Letter is old, incomplete and often does not correspond to the actual conditions of existing customary land, thus causing uncertainty and disputes; the existence of differences in interpretation of customary law and national law in courts causes the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia often do not reflect substantive justice for indigenous peoples; and this failure has implications for obstacles to customary land registration at the National Land Agency and the potential for prolonged conflict between indigenous peoples and other parties, and the abolition of the dati institution as outlined in the decision on June 1, 1923, contains the meaning of changes in the customary land ownership system in Ambon, especially the change from the concept of dati-doesoen (land dati) to poesaka-doesoen. make it in academic English.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Effendi, Ziwar. Hukum Adat Ambon Lease. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1987.

Holleman, F. D. Het Adat-Grondenrecht van Ambon En de Oeliasers. Delft: W.D. Meinema, 1923.

Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. Tebaran Pemikiran Seputar Masalah Hukum Tanah. Jakarta: Lembaga Pemberdayaan Hukum Indonesia, 2005.

Kartasapoetra, G., R. G. Kartasapoetra, A. G. Kartasapoetra, and A. Setiady. Hukum Tanah:Jaminan UUPA Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Ruchiyat, Eddy. Politik Pertanahan: Sebelum Dan Sesudah Berlakunya UUPA (U.U. No. 5 Tahun 1960). Bandung: Alumni, 1995.

Salle, Aminuddin. Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.

Sulistyowati Irianto. Memperkenalkan Studi Sosiolegal Dan Implementasi Metodologisnya, Dalam Sulistyowaty Dan Sidharta (Eds), Metode Penelitian Hukum Konstelasi Dan Refleksi, Hlm 177. Lihat Juga Dalam Sulistyowati Irianto Dalam Buku Yang Sama, Praktik Hukum: Perspektif Sosiole. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor, 2009.

Titahelu, Ronald Z. Aneka Masalah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2014.

Valentijn’s, Francois. Oud En Nieuw Oost-Indien. Amsterdam: Gerard Onder de Linden, Dordrecht, 1862.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Ambiguity in Supreme Court Decisions on Ambon’s Customary Land: The 1814 Dati Register and the Challenge of Evidentiary Systems. (2026). Batulis Civil Law Review, 7(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v7i1.3469

Most read articles by the same author(s)