Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional

Khotib Iqbal Hidayat(1), Aris Priyadi(2), Elly Kristiani Purwendah(3email)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
(3) (ID SCOPUS: 57203912837) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


This study aims to determine how the application of electronisc justice system (e-Court) in providing the principle of benefit for the parties in civil cases. This study uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data sources supported by primary data. The results showed that the existence of electronisc justice system (e-Court) can provide the principle of benefit for the parties including transparency of the process, cost, and time efficiency for justice seekers who are able to access IT (Information Technology) and the existence of dualism is still needed for justice seekers which still requires conventional proceedings due to limited access to IT (Information Technology).


Keywords


Electronics Justice System (e-Court); Law of Civil Procedure; Court Dualism

How To Cite


APA: Hidayat, K.I., Priyadi, A., & Purwendah, E.K. (2020). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421.
IEEE: K.I. Hidayat, A. Priyadi, and E.K. Purwendah, "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14-23, Oct. 2020. Accessed on: Jul. 24, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421
Harvard: Hidayat, K.I., Priyadi, A., and Purwendah, E.K., (2020). "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 1(1), pp. 14-23. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421 (Accessed on: 24 July 2021)
Chicago: Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional." Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (October 30, 2020): 14-23. Accessed July 24, 2021. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421
Vancouver: Hidayat KI, Priyadi A, Purwendah EK. Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2020 Oct 30 [cited 2021 Jul 24];1(1):14-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421
MLA 8th: Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 30 Oct. 2020, pp. 14-23, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421. Accessed 24 Jul. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{BALLREV421,
		author = {Khotib Hidayat and Aris Priyadi and Elly Purwendah},
		title = {Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {1},
		number = {1},
		year = {2020},
		keywords = {Electronics Justice System (e-Court); Law of Civil Procedure; Court Dualism},
		abstract = {This study aims to determine how the application of electronisc justice system (e-Court) in providing the principle of benefit for the parties in civil cases. This study uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data sources supported by primary data. The results showed that the existence of electronisc justice system (e-Court) can provide the principle of benefit for the parties including transparency of the process, cost, and time efficiency for justice seekers who are able to access IT (Information Technology) and the existence of dualism is still needed for justice seekers which still requires conventional proceedings due to limited access to IT (Information Technology).},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {14--23}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/421}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Jurnal

Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan online Di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 02(01), 46-58.

Retnaningsih, S., Nasution, D. L. S., Velentina, R. A., Manthovani, K. (2020). Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Peng. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486


Sudarsono. (2019). Konsep Peradilan Secara Elektronik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 3(1), 42-64.

Sunarto. (2016). Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.5.2.2016.249-276

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 481-489. http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/121/68
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121

Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Kaitannya dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291

Buku

Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Fakhriah, E. L. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Syahrani, R. (2016). Sistem Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Online/World Wide Web

Mahkama Agung RI. (n.d.). e-Court Mahkamah Agung RI. Retrieved October 11, 2019, from https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id

Pengadilan Negeri Ungaran. (n.d.). Prosedur Perkara Perdata. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://pn-ungaran.go.id/home/index.php/prosedur-perkara/prosedur-perkara-perdata/254-pengajuan-gugatan

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 508 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 494 times

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Administrasi Perkara Perdata Secara E-Court di Indonesia
Hisam Ahyani, Muhamad Ghofir Makturidi, Muharir Muharir
Batulis Civil Law Review  vol: 2  issue: 1  first page: 56  year: 2021  
Type: Journal [View Source]



DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421



Copyright (c) 2020 Khotib Iqbal Hidayat, Aris Priyadi, Elly Kristiani Purwendah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Administrasi Perkara Perdata Secara E-Court di Indonesia
Hisam Ahyani, Muhamad Ghofir Makturidi, Muharir Muharir
Batulis Civil Law Review  vol: 2  issue: 1  first page: 56  year: 2021  
Type: Journal [View Source]