Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421Keywords:
Electronics Justice System (e-Court), Law of Civil Procedure, Court DualismAbstract
This study aims to determine how the application of electronisc justice system (e-Court) in providing the principle of benefit for the parties in civil cases. This study uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data sources supported by primary data. The results showed that the existence of electronisc justice system (e-Court) can provide the principle of benefit for the parties including transparency of the process, cost, and time efficiency for justice seekers who are able to access IT (Information Technology) and the existence of dualism is still needed for justice seekers which still requires conventional proceedings due to limited access to IT (Information Technology).
Downloads
Citation Metrics
Author Biography
-
Elly Kristiani Purwendah, (ID SCOPUS: 57203912837) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
References
Jurnal
Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan online Di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 02(01), 46-58.
Retnaningsih, S., Nasution, D. L. S., Velentina, R. A., Manthovani, K. (2020). Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Peng. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486
Sudarsono. (2019). Konsep Peradilan Secara Elektronik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 3(1), 42-64.
Sunarto. (2016). Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.5.2.2016.249-276
Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 481-489. http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/121/68
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121
Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Kaitannya dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291
Buku
Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Fakhriah, E. L. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Syahrani, R. (2016). Sistem Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Online/World Wide Web
Mahkama Agung RI. (n.d.). e-Court Mahkamah Agung RI. Retrieved October 11, 2019, from https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id
Pengadilan Negeri Ungaran. (n.d.). Prosedur Perkara Perdata. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://pn-ungaran.go.id/home/index.php/prosedur-perkara/prosedur-perkara-perdata/254-pengajuan-gugatan
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Khotib Iqbal Hidayat, Aris Priyadi, Elly Kristiani Purwendah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licence Terms: Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
