Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional

Khotib Iqbal Hidayat; Aris Priyadi; Elly Kristiani Purwendah

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional

Khotib Iqbal Hidayat⁽¹⁾, Aris Priyadi⁽²⁾, Elly Kristiani Purwendah⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
(3) (ID SCOPUS: 57203912837) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the application of electronisc justice system (e-Court) in providing the principle of benefit for the parties in civil cases. This study uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data sources supported by primary data. The results showed that the existence of electronisc justice system (e-Court) can provide the principle of benefit for the parties including transparency of the process, cost, and time efficiency for justice seekers who are able to access IT (Information Technology) and the existence of dualism is still needed for justice seekers which still requires conventional proceedings due to limited access to IT (Information Technology).

Keywords

Electronics Justice System (e-Court); Law of Civil Procedure; Court Dualism

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

Published

2020-10-30

How To Cite

APA: Hidayat, K.I., Priyadi, A., & Purwendah, E.K. (2020). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421.

IEEE: K.I. Hidayat, A. Priyadi, and E.K. Purwendah, "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14-23, Oct. 2020. Accessed on: Apr. 2, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

Harvard: Hidayat, K.I., Priyadi, A., and Purwendah, E.K., (2020). "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 1(1), pp. 14-23. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421 (Accessed on: 2 April 2025)

Chicago: Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional." Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (October 30, 2020): 14-23. Accessed April 2, 2025. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

Vancouver: Hidayat KI, Priyadi A, Purwendah EK. Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2020 Oct 30 [cited 2025 Apr 2];1(1):14-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

MLA 8th: Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 30 Oct. 2020, pp. 14-23, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421. Accessed 2 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV421,
		author = {Khotib Hidayat and Aris Priyadi and Elly Purwendah},
		title = {Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {1},
		number = {1},
		year = {2020},
		keywords = {Electronics Justice System (e-Court); Law of Civil Procedure; Court Dualism},
		abstract = {This study aims to determine how the application of electronisc justice system (e-Court) in providing the principle of benefit for the parties in civil cases. This study uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data sources supported by primary data. The results showed that the existence of electronisc justice system (e-Court) can provide the principle of benefit for the parties including transparency of the process, cost, and time efficiency for justice seekers who are able to access IT (Information Technology) and the existence of dualism is still needed for justice seekers which still requires conventional proceedings due to limited access to IT (Information Technology).},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {14--23}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/421}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Jurnal

Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan online Di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 02(01), 46-58.

Retnaningsih, S., Nasution, D. L. S., Velentina, R. A., Manthovani, K. (2020). Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Peng. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486

Sudarsono. (2019). Konsep Peradilan Secara Elektronik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 3(1), 42-64.

Sunarto. (2016). Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.5.2.2016.249-276

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 481-489. http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/121/68
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121

Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Kaitannya dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291

Buku

Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Fakhriah, E. L. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Syahrani, R. (2016). Sistem Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Online/World Wide Web

Mahkama Agung RI. (n.d.). e-Court Mahkamah Agung RI. Retrieved October 11, 2019, from https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id

Pengadilan Negeri Ungaran. (n.d.). Prosedur Perkara Perdata. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://pn-ungaran.go.id/home/index.php/prosedur-perkara/prosedur-perkara-perdata/254-pengajuan-gugatan

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 5618 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 5762 times

Cited-By:

1. IMPLEMENTATION OF SIMPLE, FAST AND LOW-COST PRINCIPLES IN E-SUMMONS WITH THE E-COURT SYSTEM
Dian Latifiani, Yusriyadi Yusriyadi, Agus Sarono, Esmi Warassih Pudjirahayu, Suryo Adi Widigdo, Nur Arif Nugraha
Diponegoro Law Review vol: 8 issue: 1 first page: 107 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]

2. Administrasi Perkara Perdata Secara E-Court di Indonesia
Hisam Ahyani, Muhamad Ghofir Makturidi, Muharir Muharir
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 56 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]

3. Evidence of Contract Dispute Settlement in Electronic Trials in Indonesia in the Construction of the Ius Constitutum and Ius Constituendum
Faizal Kurniawan, Erni Agustin, Xavier Nugraha, Rahajeng Dzakiyya Ikbar, Stefania Arshanty Felicia
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal vol: 7 issue: SI11 first page: 21 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]