Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak

(1) Pengadilan Tinggi Ambon, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561
Published
2021-05-31
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV561, author = {Nurainy Usman and Merry Tjoanda and Saartje Alfons}, title = {Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak}, journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, year = {2021}, keywords = {Because of Law; Termination of Contract; Unilaterally}, abstract = {This study aims to determine how the arrangements for the unilateral termination of the contract/agreement and what are the legal consequences arising from the unilateral termination of the contract. The research method used is normative juridical. The approach used in this research is the statute approach and the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The conclusion of the research results is that; contract termination arrangements and legal consequences are regulated in Articles 1266, 1267, 1243 and 1365 of the Civil Code. The conditions for an agreement to be canceled unilaterally are that the agreement must be reciprocal, there is default, and the cancellation must be requested from the judge. Unilateral termination of the agreement due to default without going through the court is an act against the law. The legal consequence of the unilateral termination of the agreement due to default is a claim for compensation from the party who feels aggrieved. The Civil Code does not explicitly regulate the differentiation of compensation as a result of default with compensation as a result of an act against the law. Based on the research results, it is found that compensation as a result of default is compensation in the form of material, while compensation for an illegal act is compensation in the form of material and immaterial. It is hoped that in the future there will be clear regulations regarding compensation as a result of default and compensation as a result of acts against the law.}, issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {93--101} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/561} }
Azzahra, F., Setyowati, R. K., & Asmaniar, A. (2019). Pemutusan Perjanjian Pemborongan Bangunan Secara Sepihak Akibat Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 190K/PDT/2015). Jurnal Krisna Law, 1(3), 1-6. http://fh-unkris.com/journal/index.php/krisnalaw/article/view/33
Beatson, S. J., Burrows, A., & Cartwright, J. (2016). Anson's Law of Contract. Oxford University Press.
Djojodirjo, M. A. M. (2006). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Pradnya Paramita.
Fuady, M. (2010). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum : pendekatan kontemporer. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Prenada Media Group.
HS, S. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Sinar Grafika.
Kunarso, & Sumaryanto, A. D. (2020). Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.
Panggabean, H. P. (2010). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) Sebagai Alasan (Baru) Untuk Pembatalan Perjanjian (Berbagai Perkembangan Hukum di Belanda). Liberty.
Satrio, J. (2001). Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Lahir dari Perjanjian. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Subekti. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa, Jakarta.
Suharnoko. (2013). Hukum Perjanjian: Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Syaifuddin, M. (2016). Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik hukum (Seri Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan). Mandar Maju.
Weydekamp, G. (2013). Pembatalan Perjanjian Sepihak sebagai Suatu Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Lex Privatum, 1(4), 148-158. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3072
Cited-By:
1. Analisis Kritis Terhadap Daya Batas Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Herman Herman, Heri Tahir, Ririn Nurfaathirany Heri, Firmansyah Firmansyah
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 61 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Penjual Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Online
Tesalonica Heavenly Lasut, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 4 issue: 7 first page: 546 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Nurainy Usman; Pengadilan Tinggi Ambon, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Merry Tjoanda; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Saartje Sarah Alfons; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Because of Law; Termination of Contract; Unilaterally |
4. | Description | Abstract | This study aims to determine how the arrangements for the unilateral termination of the contract/agreement and what are the legal consequences arising from the unilateral termination of the contract. The research method used is normative juridical. The approach used in this research is the statute approach and the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The conclusion of the research results is that; contract termination arrangements and legal consequences are regulated in Articles 1266, 1267, 1243 and 1365 of the Civil Code. The conditions for an agreement to be canceled unilaterally are that the agreement must be reciprocal, there is default, and the cancellation must be requested from the judge. Unilateral termination of the agreement due to default without going through the court is an act against the law. The legal consequence of the unilateral termination of the agreement due to default is a claim for compensation from the party who feels aggrieved. The Civil Code does not explicitly regulate the differentiation of compensation as a result of default with compensation as a result of an act against the law. Based on the research results, it is found that compensation as a result of default is compensation in the form of material, while compensation for an illegal act is compensation in the form of material and immaterial. It is hoped that in the future there will be clear regulations regarding compensation as a result of default and compensation as a result of acts against the law. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-05-31 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/561 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 2, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, MEI 2021 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2021 Nurainy Usman, Merry Tjoanda, Saartje Sarah Alfons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Analisis Kritis Terhadap Daya Batas Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Herman Herman, Heri Tahir, Ririn Nurfaathirany Heri, Firmansyah Firmansyah
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 61 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Penjual Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Online
Tesalonica Heavenly Lasut, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 4 issue: 7 first page: 546 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]