Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak

Nurainy Usman; Merry Tjoanda; Saartje Sarah Alfons

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561

Authors

Nurainy Usman Pengadilan Tinggi Ambon, Ambon
Merry Tjoanda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Saartje Sarah Alfons Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.561

Keywords:

Because of Law, Termination of Contract, Unilaterally

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the arrangements for the unilateral termination of the contract/agreement and what are the legal consequences arising from the unilateral termination of the contract. The research method used is normative juridical. The approach used in this research is the statute approach and the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The conclusion of the research results is that; contract termination arrangements and legal consequences are regulated in Articles 1266, 1267, 1243 and 1365 of the Civil Code. The conditions for an agreement to be canceled unilaterally are that the agreement must be reciprocal, there is default, and the cancellation must be requested from the judge. Unilateral termination of the agreement due to default without going through the court is an act against the law. The legal consequence of the unilateral termination of the agreement due to default is a claim for compensation from the party who feels aggrieved. The Civil Code does not explicitly regulate the differentiation of compensation as a result of default with compensation as a result of an act against the law. Based on the research results, it is found that compensation as a result of default is compensation in the form of material, while compensation for an illegal act is compensation in the form of material and immaterial. It is hoped that in the future there will be clear regulations regarding compensation as a result of default and compensation as a result of acts against the law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Azzahra, F., Setyowati, R. K., & Asmaniar, A. (2019). Pemutusan Perjanjian Pemborongan Bangunan Secara Sepihak Akibat Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 190K/PDT/2015). Jurnal Krisna Law, 1(3), 1-6. http://fh-unkris.com/journal/index.php/krisnalaw/article/view/33

Beatson, S. J., Burrows, A., & Cartwright, J. (2016). Anson's Law of Contract. Oxford University Press.

Djojodirjo, M. A. M. (2006). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Pradnya Paramita.

Fuady, M. (2010). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum : pendekatan kontemporer. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Prenada Media Group.

HS, S. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Sinar Grafika.

Kunarso, & Sumaryanto, A. D. (2020). Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423

Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.

Panggabean, H. P. (2010). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) Sebagai Alasan (Baru) Untuk Pembatalan Perjanjian (Berbagai Perkembangan Hukum di Belanda). Liberty.

Satrio, J. (2001). Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Lahir dari Perjanjian. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Subekti. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa, Jakarta.

Suharnoko. (2013). Hukum Perjanjian: Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Syaifuddin, M. (2016). Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik hukum (Seri Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan). Mandar Maju.

Weydekamp, G. (2013). Pembatalan Perjanjian Sepihak sebagai Suatu Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Lex Privatum, 1(4), 148-158. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3072