Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689Keywords:
Execution, Guarantee, FiduciaryAbstract
Guarantee execution is one of the ways when the debtor is negligent in carrying out his obligations which are carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Furthermore, two basic problems are formulated to be studied, namely: 1). How is the execution of movable objects that are not burdened with Fiduciary Guarantees? And 2). What legal efforts can be made by the creditor if the execution of movable objects that are not burdened? this section also describes the purpose and benefits of writing and the originality of research as the work of the real writer. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, data obtained through library research and direct research in the field. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that. Judging from the law enforcement theory, the execution of collateral objects with fiduciary guarantees at the Cooperative, namely when the debtor is declared default, the cooperative will seize the object of collateral, takeover or disbursement of collateral objects under the hand, and auction the guarantee object based on the Selling Power. And the creditor's legal efforts according to the theory of legal protection cannot be implemented, namely the cooperative as the creditor will take a non-litigation path such as negotiation and mediation. And if the non-litigation path does not produce results, the cooperative will take a litigation route, namely to file a lawsuit to the court on the basis of a default made by the debtor.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey Sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(4), 697-709.
https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709
Agnes, I. (2009). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di PT. BPR Arthaprima Danajasa Bekasi). Universitas Diponegoro.
Amarini, I. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Kosmik Hukum, 16(2), 87-106.
Bahsan, M. (2012). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Diah, M. M. (2016). Prinsip dan Bentuk-Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(2), 111-122.
Fuady, M. (2014). Konsep Hukum Perdata. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi. Peradaban.
Kurniawan, I. G. H. (2013). Tindakan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yan Mengakibatkan Perbuatan Tindak Pidana. Lex Jurnalica, 10(1), 1-7.
Manurung, D. R. N. N. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia. Universitas Tadulako.
Marbun, S., Mulyadi, M., Suhaidi, S., & Siregar, M. (2015). Perbedaan Antara Wanprestasi Dan Delik Penipuan Dalam Hubungan Perjanjian. USU Law Journal, 3(2), 126-137.
Nasution, B. J. (2014). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Mandar Maju.
Patrik, P. (1998). Hukum Perdata II. Sinar Grafika.
Prodjodikoro, R. W. (2004). Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian. Mandar Maju.
Sembiring, J. J. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Visimedia.
Setyorini, A. (2017). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dengan Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2187
Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 107-120.
Wahyuni, D. T. (2011). Standar Penanganan Pinjaman Bermasalah Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sarana Aneka JASA. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Wibowo, A. T. (2013). Analisis Prosedur Pemberian Kredit pada UED-SP Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar Untuk Menekan Terjadinya Kredit Macet. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zaeni, A. (2005). Hukum Bisnis Prinsip dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 I Made Arjaya, Nyoman Putra Suhambara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licence Terms: Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
