Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689
Published
2021-11-27
How To Cite
@article{BALLREV689, author = {I Made Arjaya and Nyoman Suhambara}, title = {Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian}, journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, year = {2021}, keywords = {Execution; Guarantee; Fiduciary}, abstract = {Guarantee execution is one of the ways when the debtor is negligent in carrying out his obligations which are carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Furthermore, two basic problems are formulated to be studied, namely: 1). How is the execution of movable objects that are not burdened with Fiduciary Guarantees? And 2). What legal efforts can be made by the creditor if the execution of movable objects that are not burdened? this section also describes the purpose and benefits of writing and the originality of research as the work of the real writer. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, data obtained through library research and direct research in the field. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that. Judging from the law enforcement theory, the execution of collateral objects with fiduciary guarantees at the Cooperative, namely when the debtor is declared default, the cooperative will seize the object of collateral, takeover or disbursement of collateral objects under the hand, and auction the guarantee object based on the Selling Power. And the creditor's legal efforts according to the theory of legal protection cannot be implemented, namely the cooperative as the creditor will take a non-litigation path such as negotiation and mediation. And if the non-litigation path does not produce results, the cooperative will take a litigation route, namely to file a lawsuit to the court on the basis of a default made by the debtor.}, issn = {2746-8151}, pages = {140--151} doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/689} }
Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey Sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(4), 697-709.
https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709
Agnes, I. (2009). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di PT. BPR Arthaprima Danajasa Bekasi). Universitas Diponegoro.
Amarini, I. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Kosmik Hukum, 16(2), 87-106.
Bahsan, M. (2012). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Diah, M. M. (2016). Prinsip dan Bentuk-Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(2), 111-122.
Fuady, M. (2014). Konsep Hukum Perdata. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi. Peradaban.
Kurniawan, I. G. H. (2013). Tindakan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yan Mengakibatkan Perbuatan Tindak Pidana. Lex Jurnalica, 10(1), 1-7.
Manurung, D. R. N. N. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia. Universitas Tadulako.
Marbun, S., Mulyadi, M., Suhaidi, S., & Siregar, M. (2015). Perbedaan Antara Wanprestasi Dan Delik Penipuan Dalam Hubungan Perjanjian. USU Law Journal, 3(2), 126-137.
Nasution, B. J. (2014). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Mandar Maju.
Patrik, P. (1998). Hukum Perdata II. Sinar Grafika.
Prodjodikoro, R. W. (2004). Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian. Mandar Maju.
Sembiring, J. J. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Visimedia.
Setyorini, A. (2017). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dengan Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2187
Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 107-120.
Wahyuni, D. T. (2011). Standar Penanganan Pinjaman Bermasalah Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sarana Aneka JASA. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Wibowo, A. T. (2013). Analisis Prosedur Pemberian Kredit pada UED-SP Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar Untuk Menekan Terjadinya Kredit Macet. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zaeni, A. (2005). Hukum Bisnis Prinsip dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | I Made Arjaya; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Nyoman Putra Suhambara; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Execution; Guarantee; Fiduciary |
4. | Description | Abstract | Guarantee execution is one of the ways when the debtor is negligent in carrying out his obligations which are carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Furthermore, two basic problems are formulated to be studied, namely: 1). How is the execution of movable objects that are not burdened with Fiduciary Guarantees? And 2). What legal efforts can be made by the creditor if the execution of movable objects that are not burdened? this section also describes the purpose and benefits of writing and the originality of research as the work of the real writer. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, data obtained through library research and direct research in the field. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that. Judging from the law enforcement theory, the execution of collateral objects with fiduciary guarantees at the Cooperative, namely when the debtor is declared default, the cooperative will seize the object of collateral, takeover or disbursement of collateral objects under the hand, and auction the guarantee object based on the Selling Power. And the creditor's legal efforts according to the theory of legal protection cannot be implemented, namely the cooperative as the creditor will take a non-litigation path such as negotiation and mediation. And if the non-litigation path does not produce results, the cooperative will take a litigation route, namely to file a lawsuit to the court on the basis of a default made by the debtor. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-11-27 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/689 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Batulis Civil Law Review; Vol 2, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 2021 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : Batulis Civil Law Review Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2021 I Made Arjaya, Nyoman Putra Suhambara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.