Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian

I Made Arjaya; Nyoman Putra Suhambara

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689

Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian

I Made Arjaya⁽¹⁾, Nyoman Putra Suhambara⁽²⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Guarantee execution is one of the ways when the debtor is negligent in carrying out his obligations which are carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Furthermore, two basic problems are formulated to be studied, namely: 1). How is the execution of movable objects that are not burdened with Fiduciary Guarantees? And 2). What legal efforts can be made by the creditor if the execution of movable objects that are not burdened? this section also describes the purpose and benefits of writing and the originality of research as the work of the real writer. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, data obtained through library research and direct research in the field. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that. Judging from the law enforcement theory, the execution of collateral objects with fiduciary guarantees at the Cooperative, namely when the debtor is declared default, the cooperative will seize the object of collateral, takeover or disbursement of collateral objects under the hand, and auction the guarantee object based on the Selling Power. And the creditor's legal efforts according to the theory of legal protection cannot be implemented, namely the cooperative as the creditor will take a non-litigation path such as negotiation and mediation. And if the non-litigation path does not produce results, the cooperative will take a litigation route, namely to file a lawsuit to the court on the basis of a default made by the debtor.

Keywords

Execution; Guarantee; Fiduciary

DOI

10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689

Published

2021-11-27

How To Cite

APA: Arjaya, I., & Suhambara, N.P. (2021). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2(2), 140 - 151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689.

IEEE: I. Arjaya, and N.P. Suhambara, "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian", Batulis Civ. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 140 - 151, Nov. 2021. Accessed on: Nov. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689

Harvard: Arjaya, I., and Suhambara, N.P., (2021). "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian". Batulis Civil Law Review, Volume 2(2), pp. 140 - 151. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689 (Accessed on: 22 November 2024)

Chicago: Arjaya, I Made, and Nyoman Putra Suhambara. "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian." Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 2 (November 27, 2021): 140 - 151. Accessed November 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689

Vancouver: Arjaya I, Suhambara NP. Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian. Batulis Civ. Law Rev. [Internet]. 2021 Nov 27 [cited 2024 Nov 22];2(2):140 - 151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689

MLA 8th: Arjaya, I Made, and Nyoman Putra Suhambara. "Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian." Batulis Civil Law Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 27 Nov. 2021, pp. 140 - 151, doi:10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689. Accessed 22 Nov. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{BALLREV689,
		author = {I Made Arjaya and Nyoman Suhambara},
		title = {Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian},
		journal = {Batulis Civil Law Review},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Execution; Guarantee; Fiduciary},
		abstract = {Guarantee execution is one of the ways when the debtor is negligent in carrying out his obligations which are carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Furthermore, two basic problems are formulated to be studied, namely: 1). How is the execution of movable objects that are not burdened with Fiduciary Guarantees? And 2). What legal efforts can be made by the creditor if the execution of movable objects that are not burdened? this section also describes the purpose and benefits of writing and the originality of research as the work of the real writer. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, data obtained through library research and direct research in the field. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that. Judging from the law enforcement theory, the execution of collateral objects with fiduciary guarantees at the Cooperative, namely when the debtor is declared default, the cooperative will seize the object of collateral, takeover or disbursement of collateral objects under the hand, and auction the guarantee object based on the Selling Power. And the creditor's legal efforts according to the theory of legal protection cannot be implemented, namely the cooperative as the creditor will take a non-litigation path such as negotiation and mediation. And if the non-litigation path does not produce results, the cooperative will take a litigation route, namely to file a lawsuit to the court on the basis of a default made by the debtor.},
				issn = {2746-8151},		pages = {140--151}			doi = {10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/ballrev/article/view/689}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey Sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(4), 697-709.

https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709

Agnes, I. (2009). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di PT. BPR Arthaprima Danajasa Bekasi). Universitas Diponegoro.

Amarini, I. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Kosmik Hukum, 16(2), 87-106.

Bahsan, M. (2012). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Diah, M. M. (2016). Prinsip dan Bentuk-Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(2), 111-122.

Fuady, M. (2014). Konsep Hukum Perdata. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi. Peradaban.

Kurniawan, I. G. H. (2013). Tindakan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yan Mengakibatkan Perbuatan Tindak Pidana. Lex Jurnalica, 10(1), 1-7.

Manurung, D. R. N. N. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia. Universitas Tadulako.

Marbun, S., Mulyadi, M., Suhaidi, S., & Siregar, M. (2015). Perbedaan Antara Wanprestasi Dan Delik Penipuan Dalam Hubungan Perjanjian. USU Law Journal, 3(2), 126-137.

Nasution, B. J. (2014). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Mandar Maju.

Patrik, P. (1998). Hukum Perdata II. Sinar Grafika.

Prodjodikoro, R. W. (2004). Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian. Mandar Maju.

Sembiring, J. J. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Visimedia.

Setyorini, A. (2017). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dengan Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2187

Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica, 10(2), 107-120.

Wahyuni, D. T. (2011). Standar Penanganan Pinjaman Bermasalah Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sarana Aneka JASA. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wibowo, A. T. (2013). Analisis Prosedur Pemberian Kredit pada UED-SP Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar Untuk Menekan Terjadinya Kredit Macet. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim.

Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zaeni, A. (2005). Hukum Bisnis Prinsip dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Full Text: PDF