Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit  Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga

Ronald Saija

doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126

Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga

Ronald Saija⁽¹⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Legislation Number 34 of 2007 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Obligations of Debt Payments is not fully complete in order to protect the rights of creditors, in connection with the dispute of PT. Golden Adishoes has no clarity about repayment in full if it turns out that the debtor's assets are insolvent is not enough to pay all of his debts, indirectly the creditor is required to accept the fact that all of his debts will not be repaid in full by bankrupt debtors without any actions and what solutions can be made by the creditor before the bankruptcy application is filed by the bankrupt debtor to the Commercial Court.

Keywords

Protection; Creditors; Bankruptcy

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126

Published

2019-02-28

How To Cite

APA: Saija, R. (2019). Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga. SASI, 24(2), 114-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126.

IEEE: R. Saija, "Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga", SASI, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 114-123, Feb. 2019. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126

Harvard: Saija, R., (2019). "Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga". SASI, Volume 24(2), pp. 114-123. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)

Chicago: Saija, Ronald. "Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga." SASI 24, no. 2 (February 28, 2019): 114-123. Accessed December 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126

Vancouver: Saija R. Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga. SASI [Internet]. 2019 Feb 28 [cited 2024 Dec 22];24(2):114-123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126

MLA 8th: Saija, Ronald. "Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga." SASI, vol. 24, no. 2, 28 Feb. 2019, pp. 114-123, doi:10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI126,
		author = {Ronald Saija},
		title = {Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit  Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {24},
		number = {2},
		year = {2019},
		keywords = {Protection; Creditors; Bankruptcy},
		abstract = {Legislation Number 34 of 2007 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Obligations of Debt Payments is not fully complete in order to protect the rights of creditors, in connection with the dispute of PT. Golden Adishoes has no clarity about repayment in full if it turns out that the debtor's assets are insolvent is not enough to pay all of his debts, indirectly the creditor is required to accept the fact that all of his debts will not be repaid in full by bankrupt debtors without any actions and what solutions can be made by the creditor before the bankruptcy application is filed by the bankrupt debtor to the Commercial Court.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {114--123}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v24i2.126},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/126}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Hartono, Sri Redjeki. (2000). Kapita Selekta Hukum Ekonomi, Bandung: Mandar Maju. Hartini, Rahayu. (2007). Edisi Revisi Hukum Kepailitan, Malang: UMM Press.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, Cetakan IV, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Subhan, M Hadi. (2012). Hukum kepailitan (Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Pradilan), Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group.

Waluyo, Bernadete. (1999). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Cetakan Pertama, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Siregar, Mustafa. (1990). Efektifitas Perundang-Undangan Perbankan dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya, dengan Penelitian di Wilayah Kodya Medan, Disertasi, USU.

Widjanarko. (1999). Dampak Implementasi Undang-Undang Kepailitan Terhadap Sektor Perbankan, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 8. Budisastra, Aspek Hukum Dalam Kepailitan, http://budisastra.info/home.

Full Text: PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 3833 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) icon PDF

Download : 21260 times

Cited-By:

1. Perspektif Sanksi Pidana Kurator Menurut Hukum Kepailitan
Ronald Saija
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 1 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]

2. Analysis Of Consideration Of The Judge's Decision The Process Of Management And Settlement Of The Debtor's Property After The Bankruptcy Of The Debtor In Bankruptcy (Case Study No. 1/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi Prosedur/2022/PN.Niaga.Mdn)
Ariffani Ariffani, Rilawadi Sahputra, Syaiful Azmi
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) vol: 2 issue: 4 first page: 142 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]

3. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perusahaan Debitur Pailit dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid 19
Ronald Saija, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Batulis Civil Law Review vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 66 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Cited-By:

1. Perspektif Sanksi Pidana Kurator Menurut Hukum Kepailitan
Ronald Saija
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review vol: 1 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]