Perlindungan Hukum Rahasia Dagang Terhadap Produk Skincare Home Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1098Keywords:
Skincare Home Industry, Legal Protection, Trade SecretAbstract
Introduction: The high interest of skincare home industry products has made these product business actors mushrooming in almost all e-commerce platforms.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to examine and discuss the legal protection of intellectual property rights for skincare home industry products.
Methods of the Research: This research was conducted with a normative juridical research type using a statute approach. To answer the existing problems, the author collects legal materials through literature studies and analyzes them using qualitative analysis methods.
Results of the Research: The results of this research indicate that the legal protection that can be obtained by skincare home industry product owners in the field of trade secrets is related to confidential information that has commercial value, related to production, processing, sales, or other technical and/or economic information that has economic value and is unknown in general in the manufacture of these products. Then, the form of legal protection can be in the form of making a written agreement based on a consulting contract as a legal effort to protect his trade secrets, as well as filing a claim for compensation, using alternative dispute resolutions, and/or filing criminal charges, if there has been a violation.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adolf, H. (2016). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo.
Akmal Asamahdi Latukau, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, and Muchtar A H Labetubun. "Penggandaan Smadav PRO Tanpa Izin Pencipta Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 6 (2021): 564 – 576.
Ananda, R., (2016). Peran Home Industry Dalam Meningkatkan Ekonomi Keluarga (Study Kasus Home Industry Keripik di Kelurahan Kubu Gadang). Skripsi, Unversitas Riau.
Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Izaak, Khristofel N. “Arbitrase Sebagai Mekanisme Pilihan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis” dalam Jurnal Unstrat Lex Privatum Vol. III/ No.4 Oktober 2015.
Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, “Public Domain in Dispute Settlement of Cancellation of Industrial Design Rights.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, no. 5 (2019): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.53333/IJICC2013/10503 .
Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators,” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61, https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406.
Simandjuntak, W. (2000). Desain Industri Di Indonesia. Denpasar: Denpasar: Makalah Seminar Kerjasama FH UNUD, Klinik HAKI Jakarta, JICA.
Sutedi, A. (2009). Hak Atas Kekayan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Widjaja, G. (2001). Rahasia Dagang, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Wellastry Yamin, Ronald Saija, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
