Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i11.868Keywords:
Medical Approval, Evidence, Doctor and PatientAbstract
Introduction: Informend Consent is an agreement that is given after receiving information. Approval of action to be taken by the doctor must be done without any element of coercion.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to determine the use of Informend Consent as evidence in civil disputes and the factors that influence it.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through a literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The use of medical approval as evidence of decision Number 114/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bjm was not carried out thoroughly so that it resulted in material and immaterial losses. Factors that influence the use of medical consent as evidence include; lack of patient knowledge, answering patient doubts, confirming procedures in laws and regulations, proving doctors in the feasibility of doing something related to medical work.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Anwar, Arman. “Tanggung Gugat Resiko Dalam Aspek Hukum Kesehatan.” SASI 23, no. 2 (2018): 149–60.
Astuti, Diah Widi. “Kedudukan Hukum Rekam Medis Dan Informed Consent Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Malpraktek.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2009.
Dahlan, Sofwan. “Informed Constent.” Surakarta, 2005.
Darsono, R. Soeraryo. “Etika Hukum Kesehatan Kedokteran (Sudut Pandang Praktikus).” Semarang, 2004.
Fuady, Munir. Sumpah Hippocrates (Aspek Hukum Malpraktek Dokter). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
Guwandi, J. “Dugaan Malpraktek Medik & Draft RPP : “Perjanjian Terapetik Antara Dokter Dan Pasien.” Jakarta, 2006.
Hanafiah, M. Jusuf, and Amri Amir. Etika Kedokteran Dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: EGC, 1999.
Isfandyarie, Anny. Malpraktek Dan Resiko Medik Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Presasti Pustaka, 2005.
Komalawati, D. Veronica. Hukum Dan Etika Dalam Praktek Dokter. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1989.
Krisnawati, Ari. “Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” Universitas Udayana, 2015.
Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. “Aspek Hukum Perdata Dalam Kesehatan.” In Etika Profesi & Aspek Hukum Bidang Kesehatan, 180–211. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 2020.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.
Saija, Ronald, and Roger F. X. V. Letsoin. Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama, 2012.
Subekti. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gunawan Tamher, Ronald Saija, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
