The Judicial Commission's Supervisory Authority on the Behavior of Constitutional Court Judges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v6i1.3253Keywords:
Supervisory Authority, Judge's Behavior, Judicial Commission, Constitutional Court.Abstract
Introduction: Indonesia as a legal state upholds the principle of rule of law based on the 1945 Constitution, has institutions such as the Supreme Court, Constitutional Court, and Judicial Commission (KY) that play an important role in the justice system.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss the authority of the Judicial Commission in supervising constitutional judges and to analyze and explain the mechanism of Judicial Commission supervision of constitutional judges after Constitutional Court Decision Number: 005/PUU-TV/2006.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The problem approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials are primary legal sources and secondary legal materials. Procedures for collecting legal materials through literature studies. Processing and analyzing legal materials qualitatively.
Findings of the Research: The results showed that to achieve a good and ideal judicial system, it can be realized by maintaining the objectivity and integrity of decisions and the behavior of judges in the judicial power, but currently the position and authority of the Judicial Commission (KY) as an external supervisory institution of the judiciary is still very weak due to restrictions by the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 005/PUU/IV-2006 and a narrow interpretation of the 1945 Constitution, so to answer the needs of the community, it is necessary to revise Law Number 18 of 2011 to explicitly emphasize the authority of KY in supervising all judges, including constitutional judges. KY must also be recognized as a state institution that is equal to the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian constitutional system, in accordance with the principle of checks and balances, to ensure effective, transparent and accountable supervision.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Dalam Mahkamah Konstitusi, Bunga Rampai Mahkmah Konstitusi RI.” Jakarta, 2005.
Fedrian, D. “Membumikan Kode Etik & Pedoman Perilaku Hakim.” Buletin Komisi Yudisial 7, no. 2 (n.d.).
Hormati, Debbie Silviany. “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Peran Komisi Yudisial Dalam Penegakkan Kode Etik Mengenai Perilaku Hakim.” Lex Privatum 5, no. 8 (2017): 86–93. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/18212.
Huda, Ni’matul. Hukum Tata Negra Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.
Hz, Edi Setiadi. “Quovadis Komisi Yudisial.” ediunisba.multiply.com, n.d. http://ediunisba.multiply.com/journal/item/4.
Irham, Muhammad, Iqbal Taufik, and Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae. “Strengthening the Authority Ofthe Regional Representative Council (DPD) Doesn’t Need Through Amendments to the Constitution of The United State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945.” Jurnal Peradaban Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.33019/jph.v1i1.10.
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman. Komisi Yudisial Dari Delegitimasi Hingga Revitalisasi Moral Hakim. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2007.
Komisi Yudisial. Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial Dan Reformasi Peradilan. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial RI, 2007.
———. “Mendorong Terwujudnya Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka.” Buletin Komisi Yudisial 1, no. 5 (2007).
———. “Wewenang Dan Tugas.” komisiyudisial.go.id, n.d. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/static_content/authority_and_duties.
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. “Laporan Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007-2010.” Jakarta, 2010.
Machmudin, Dudu Duswara, and Dudu Duswara. “Peranan Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara Di Pengadilan.” Varia Justicia 25, no. 2 (2006).
Mahkama Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Cetak Biru: Membangun Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Institusi Peradilan Konstitusi Yang Modern Dan Terpercaya.” Jakarta, 2004.
Mustamu, Julista. “Diskresi Dan Tanggungjawab Administrasi Pemerintahan.” SASI 17, no. 2 (2011): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v17i2.349.
Pattinasarany, Yohanes. “Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah.” SASI 17, no. 4 (2011): 73–84.
Salmon, Hendrik, and John Tumba Jacob. “The Role of Law and Human Rights in the Formation of State Institutions: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Nigeria.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 7, no. 1 (2025): 218–44. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v7n1.p218-244.
Santoso, M Agus. “Peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Pengawasan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 18, no. 4 (2011): 604–20. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss4.art7.
Sirajuddin, and Zulkarnain. Komisi Yudisial & Eksaminasi Publik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
TriwulanTutik, Titik. “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Komisi Yudisial Sebagai Lembaga Negara Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yuridika 21, no. 4 (2006).
———. “Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI 1945.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 2 (2012): 295–311. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.51.
Voermans, Wim. Komisi Yudial Di Beberapa Negara Uni Eropa. Jakarta: LIPI, The Asia Foundation and USAID, 2002.
Wibawana, Widhia Arum. “Apa Tugas Dan Wewenang Komisi Yudisial? Ini Penjelasannya.” Detik News, 2022. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6308819/apa-tugas-dan-wewenang-komisi-yudisial-ini-penjelasannya.
Wijayanta, Tata. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Mahkamah Agung Dan High Court Od Australia Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Penegakan Hukum.” Mimbar Hukum 10, no. 3 (2002).
Wikipedia. “Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.” Wikipedia.org, n.d. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komisi_Yudisial_Republik_Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Almendo Imanuel Pohwainyaan, Hendrik Salmon, Muhammad Irham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
